This paper will be about the irony of overprotective parents introducing nursery rhymes to children that have dark, rated-r content. These same parents condemn introducing anything violent, or what they deem “inappropriate” to children because it may ruin a child’s mental stability in the future. This paper will highlight the ironies of how nursery rhymes are these inappropriate actions, events, history that are just repurposed to fit their child’s needs. Introducing these “inappropriate actions” undermine the parent’s purpose of protecting their child. The ultimate goal of this paper is to show that it is not what you introduce to your child in terms of entertainment that will ruin your child’s mental health, it is the upbringing and how you raise/teach your child to approach these situations that determines the direction the child will grow up to be in the future.
This paper will highlight the contrast between parents mindlessly using nursery rhymes as a gateway to teach their child how to build an imagination by introducing things that they are afraid other influences will damage their child such as video games, tv shows, movies.
This paper will compare and contrast similarities and differences between nursery rhymes and other influences that have been deemed potentially damaging such as video games or tv shows.
This paper will compare and contrast the psychology of introducing to children horrible influences directly vs influencing the child discreetly. Breaking down which method is more influential to a young child or if these influences have any affect on a young child at all.
This topic deserves attention because it is important to not mislabel any genre based on what is assumed to be damaging. The hypocrisy of labeling one artwork damaging while using another artwork with the same ideals only hurts people who are trying to make their art that they are proud of noticeable to the world while we dilute the special attributes of their artwork because it “may be damaging”