Dec 152016
 

Read this: http://www.chronicle.com/article/Why-a-Guerrilla/238696?cid=at&utm_source=at&utm_medium=en&elqTrackId=1904d9b3b76b4e15a650f6d1cd866468&elq=98c6a2c6229148c0a830248f479b6c1f&elqaid=11846&elqat=1&elqCampaignId=4736

So, Penn started to save and archive all US government environmental data that is still on the web. PDFs, spreadsheets, websites, data sets, grocery lists, and did I mention entire websites? This is what I mean by Trump being scary: a whole shit ton of people see this guy get elected and, believing he’ll erase and censor information, have begun saving it in the way ants store food. As if everyone senses a Flood coming.

http://www.ppehlab.org/datarefuge/

I know it does, I know it connects to us, I just don’t fully grasp it yet. I’m a humanities major and my stock and trade has been so harried by censorship that I’ve had curricula based just around banned books. Knowledge is not power. It isn’t even the capacity to act, really. Being able to suppress or disseminate knowledge, on the other, is a tool of power. #DataRefuge, then, may actually become a truly guerrilla sorta deal when we find out what kind of informatic fuckery the Trump administration will pull; if it is no longer safe to leave information in one place (on a website’s server, for example) because our government is erasing data or neglecting its host server to death then preserving that information will fall on everyone who cares to share knowledge and believes it should flow freely.

By everyone I mean I want hordes of nerds saving and sending data all around the world. Huddled, sticky fingered, hunched over screens and keyboards. We the groaning, facepalming, and memeing multitudes will be needed. Are needed. Always already.* We don’t get to play around in academe because we know but because we swore to not stop knowing more. I hope. It’s a noble calling, I was told. We are the players and the shape of the game is much clearer to the public now: the winners control the Web, the nexus and mausoleum of so much information.

This intimation of clarity only means to me that the game is about to change again. We can expect new rules to be bought into play (pun intended) as universities struggle further with privatization. We can expect whole new appeals to ignorance and mistrust of bodies of knowledge and we can expect that to show up as the same pressures as always: state demands about profitability and student demands that are shaped by state demands. Students won’t pay us mind as readily when we say “research” if public faith in government information management takes a hit; state concerns will be that universities “cannot provide access to reliable information” and the effectiveness of public higher education will diminish.

Again, I feel like a game that’s only becoming less than completely fuzzy is about to become about as clear as stirred Turkish coffee. I hope the experience isn’t as bitter.

*snerk

Bypassing Bi?

 Posted by on Wed, 11/2 at 6:46pm  report & response  No Responses »
Nov 022016
 

I found an article by Dr. Crystal Fleming, a bi woman of color sociologist & teacher, who shares her experience on coming out as Bi in the academy, after finally deciding not to be silent or ashamed about her sexual orientation. The link to the article is here: 

https://conditionallyaccepted.com/2014/02/13/openly-bisexual/ 

Also, here is her personal blog: https://awareofawareness.com/about/

 

Crystal shares a short story about how she came out in her classroom, to her students,  which was related to discussing the concept of “stigma”: “In discussing Erving Goffman’s understanding of stigma as a “discrediting” attribute, I told the story of how my 90-year-old godmother responded when I told her I date men and women.  “I’m so, so sorry to hear that,” she replied, as though I’d been diagnosed with the plague.”

After class, one of her students thanked her for coming out to the class, because this student believed that it is important for people in positions of authority to help reduce stigma. This specific thought of teachers being in positions of authority, therefore having the power to bring attention to stigma, makes me think a little deeper about not coming out as Bi at all in my classrooms. Especially because Crystal also talks about how in some ways, not acknowledging bisexuality is gaining from heterosexual privilege, since many people assumed she was hetero. I’m sure many people may assume the same about me. 

Crystal goes through her academic journey of coming out to colleagues. It was very difficult for her at first, because she did not know of one bisexual colleague, only hetero, gay, and lesbian colleagues. However, even though she did not know openly bi professors, she “made a conscious decision to connect with queer women of color.  Just knowing having other women within the profession to talk to about my concerns made all the difference” (Fleming). She also wrote more about her bi struggles in her blog, and became more confident and assertive in stating her bi identity to colleagues. She became an openly bisexual academic. 

Many  hetero people do not realize what a privilege they have in their sexual orientation, because “the truth is that in academia, just as in other professions, straight colleagues often talk about their private lives publicly, signaling their sexuality in a matter-of-fact-way that people rarely question” (Fleming). One of my favorite insights she gave, on bi experience, was  making peace with “not giving a flying fuck what folks think about my orientation, inside or outside of academia,” which made it “much easier for me to be unassumingly and unapologetically open at appropriate times within professional settings” (Fleming).

I really want to work on taking her advice, and not giving a fuck. Its just so hard! Especially in the classroom. But I do wonder if I did come out, maybe in a small way, like in a theoretical kind of convo, if that would help other students who may be Bi. Or just help dissipate ignorance about Bisexuality.  I also really hate the idea that I could be gaining from hetero privilege because people are assuming I am hetero by default. I mean, how can someone tell someone is Bi?? I think I have a Bi-dar (like Gay-dar), but everyone does not have this skill. 

 

To Bypass Bi or not, that is the question.

 

A Sea of C Students

 Posted by on Mon, 9/26 at 2:08pm  report & response  No Responses »
Sep 262016
 

In surfing through the Inside Higher Ed website I stumbled upon this article that caught my eye.  Written by John Warner, “The Roots of Those Not So Good C’s” (hyperlink below) discusses the potential causes of C students, particularly from his experience in teaching freshmen level writing courses.  I find this discussion engaging because I feel that at times that he is describing some of my exact students. Warner starts out his article with a surprising and very interesting fact by stating,”The news out of the University of Arizona that students who received a C in the required first-year writing course have a less than 50 percent likelihood of graduating…”  I found this so interesting because there was clearly a direct correlation made between this particular course that we are all currently teaching and how it can be an indicator of student success (or failure).  Due to the nature and size of our classes we may be the best poised teachers to see problems arise in our students.  We may additionally be best equipped to help guide them to successfully overcoming those problems, when such a feat is possible.

Warner discusses 5 potential causes for students being C students.  One of these is “lack of writing experience/substandard pre-college education” which definitely speaks to my students.  In discussion today my students brought up the fact that many of them have never been expected to write papers that are more than 2 MAYBE 3 pages in length.  Many of my students feel like they are flying blindly into the 4-5 page essays that we are expecting them to write.  This was a bit surprising to me and makes me look at my expectations in a new light.

The next potential cause that Warner discusses is “college transition problems.”  Under this headline Warner alludes to the “freedom” that college offers for students.  He basically talks about how students struggle to balance between school life and personal fun.  This point also hit home for me as I had a student tell me today that she made a bad decision to go out on Saturday night which caused her to miss both of her UCEW meetings that she had scheduled.  I know I should have had some sympathy for her but it was difficult for me.  I basically told her that she has to be responsible about the decisions she is making, and she seemed to already have learned her lesson from this experience so I felt that I did not need to belabor the point.

While Warner goes on to discuss 3 more potential causes for C students, the last one that I felt I related to was what he referred to as the “acute problem.”  He discusses this as a range of “minor” to “major” outside factors such as “illness or death of a loved one” or “homesickness.”  While I always take stories from students with a grain of salt (especially when they conveniently fall on the due date for a major assignment), I also feel like until they prove me wrong I have to give them the benefit of the doubt.  I have already had multiple students report to me that they have lost friends or family members, or are personally going through some kind of major issue.  While most of these students are doing okay with their course work, I can see the potential for them to be affected long-term by some of these issues and am currently doing everything I can to maintain a certain level of expectation while also remaining sensitive to their basic emotional needs.  This whole teaching thing is more complex than I could have ever imagined.  I knew it wasn’t going to be easy, but I didn’t realize how difficult it was going to be for me to maintain a fair balance of expectation in the classroom.

https://www.insidehighered.com/blogs/just-visiting/roots-those-not-good-enough-cs

Sep 182016
 

The article I am responding to is called : “Why I No Longer Eat Watermelon, or How a Racist Email Caused Me to Leave Graduate School,” by Robert Palmer, written on July 10, 2015. Here is the link: https://interrogatingmedia.com/2015/07/10/why-i-no-longer-eat-watermelon-or-how-a-racist-email-caused-me-to-leave-graduate-school/

 

     In this article, Palmer is discussing a serious situation that occurred in the English graduate program he was in (Rutgers University), that was dealt with terribly. He is a person of color. The serious situation is referring to an email that was sent out by a white student containing racial mockery. More specifically, this racial mockery was derogatory towards Black people. The email was referring to a southern movie students watched from a literature class, and was asking mostly other assumed to be white students if they wanted to all meet up and watch it together with some “watermillyum (watermelon), straw hats, and other Darkeyisms.” She also said that she may yell racist things at the tv. The whole email is on the link I provided above. Not surprisingly, Palmer was very bothered by this email and student email responses that followed, which contained more racial mockery and dismissal of the racist language and stereotypes that were being used. All of this disturbed Palmer because he says, “It was casually dismissive and derisive of black people and black experience,” and because “It was indicative of a larger callousness toward race in the department.” And if you have not yet guessed it, the severity of the situation was handled terribly within the English department, resulting in the racist student getting away with what she said and with Palmer being silenced and shamed for expressing instances of student racism, leading to him becoming isolated and eventually dropping out of graduate school a few years after.

 

     There are several things that bothered me in reading this article, many of them based off of what I have experienced within the English department and graduate school in general. It is obvious, at least to me, that this allowance of racist mockery within the English department is not just the fault of students; it is also the fault of the academic institution that fosters environments for ignorance to grow. Ignorance grows when professors and directors do nothing when students make racist, classist, sexist, or homophobic comments in class. Or, when students, specifically white students, are not held accountable when they make underlying racist/classist jokes regarding language or dialect that are just supposed to be “funny.” I guess English is a colonial language and dialect after all.  Professors and directors themselves can perpetuate prejudice through their own jokes and comments, which provides a horrible example for students. Palmer shares an example of this through the following statement made by a professor: “Or the professor who, when describing her own subconscious racism, talked about being surprised by seeing black people at Whole Foods because they only eat potato chips. P.S.: They sell potato chips at Whole Foods.” There is also no stable or fair system in place to figure out how to handle these situations. Why would there be if the academy is just another business? It would just be too much effort and too much resources to use apparently. Plus, if a person of color is in a department of mainly all white middle/upper class students who are defensive of their implicit racism and white privilege, do you really think a person of color’s voice is going to matter? Unfortunately the answer is “no” in most instances. 

 

I empathized with Palmer so much when reading how he felt when these situations occurred, especially with the following statement he made:

“The feeling I recall most intensely from those following years was that of feeling unwanted and unwelcome, like I’d crashed a party. I was a nagging infection that just wouldn’t go away. And that’s often how it feels to be a person of color in white spaces who has anything to say about race. You become the introducer of bad feelings, though in reality those feelings are already there, silent and unchallenged, but present.”

     I have experienced what Palmer said in many spaces before, especially being a blunt Latinx person, commonly known as the “fiesty Latina” who you better “watch out for.” What I find funny about this is how white women and men can be just as blunt, but, they can actually get away with it unlike Latino/a and Black people. Instead, they are the “angry Spanish woman/man” or the “angry Black woman/man.” Something to think about: Do we ever say “white angry woman/man?” Coming from a department that explicitly discusses prejudice, how it is formed, how it is manifested, and how it is perpetuated, I can never let prejudice just slide, even if I am ostracized because of it. To just let it be would be contradictory to my feminist of color consciousness based in my own experiences as a Latinx. This happened the other day in English theory class when there was a discussion of Beyonce’s message in her video formation. Since the class consists of mostly white students, I was not surprised by their commentary that completely dismissed Black people’s circumstances while avoiding focus on their own white privilege. I was also not surprised at the obvious tension within the room in trying to share their free writes on the video. They used big words instead, and one person even described the people in Beyonce’s video as “inferior.” When I made the two undoubtedly controversial and uncomfortable comments that I did, I was  met with silence and dismissal. Palmer would get my experience since he is aware of how “most conversations about race in America are always already doomed. White people tend to want to name the terms of these conversations.” I was trying to point out how everyone was skating around the actual discussion of racism, and I have to admit I was quite bothered myself that professors allow ignorant comments to continue on without being discussed. I think it is very useful to discuss problematic topics, especially because  how else will people learn if we leave systemic biases unquestioned? If we just live in our comfortable spaces, how will we ever be confronted with the reality we are veiled to?

 

 

     There is a great deal more I could share, however, this post is already very long because I feel strongly about the topic, and I’m used to writing ideas in 20 page grad papers. But I will say this: if I was actually an English grad student, I would most likely end up dropping out like Palmer did. Because why? Because people like me who make people uncomfortable with truth, are met with disdain and dislike. The perpetrators  never admit to this of course, and will either say you are “too sensitive,” “all lives matter,” or will act aloof, the most common defensive mechanisms. I will  not stay silent anyway, that would be internal suffocation.  But I must ask, why should people of color always have to be the ones to inform white people on their racism/classism, as Palmer and myself had to? As Audre Lorde, a lesbian feminist of color icon would respond:

“People of color are expected to educate white people as to our humanity. Women are expected to educate men. Lesbians, [bisexuals], and gay men are expected to educate the heterosexual world. The oppressors maintain their position and evade their responsibility for their own actions.”

audre-lorde__do-not-stay-silent