Pretty Hurts

 Posted by on Tue, 9/13 at 9:34pm  Uncategorized  No Responses »
Sep 132016
 

          As I was growing up body and beauty image was an aspect in life that I really struggled with. This problem emerged from an incident that happened in middle school. I was in gym class when a girl classmate of mine mentioned “you are really pretty for a big girl.” In my head I thought “really pretty for a big girl” was that a compliment or an offense? Like does my body size constitute my level of prettiness? Are you saying that if I was a thinner person then I would be more beautiful? That day my level of self esteem took a plummeting downfall and it would take years for me to get it back. I would be lying if I said that those words don’t creep up in my memory sometimes. However I now know that they don’t define my worth as a person. Unfortunately I am not alone in this torment that is body image.  According to Statistic Brain 91% of women are unhappy with their bodies.

          Women have always had a sort of pressure to look a certain way in order to be thought of as pretty. My question is what makes someone pretty? The media glamorizes thin bodies and perfect skin. Pretty in the media is defined as a standard height and size but where is everyone else on the “pretty” spectrum. It isn’t until recently that the term “curvy” and “plus size” have been brought to light. Even though “curvy” is what everyone is talking about we are still hesitant in letting it in our definition of beauty.

          Their are many aspects in our lives that distort our body and beauty image. Did you know that Barbie is one of them. Yes, Barbie, a toy that every little girl has played with and looked up to. According to a story published by Refinery 29 on my Snapchat (yes I still have social media) girls who played with a traditional Barbie reported a higher dissatisfaction with their own bodies opposed to the girls who played with the new, tall, and curvy Barbies. It is very sad to read about young girls being unhappy with themselves. However girls are not the only ones who suffer from body image issues. Boys can also be sucked into this problem. The pediatrics journal published that 40% of boys exercise regularly and 90% exercise occasionally all with the propose to bulk up.

          Whether you are a boy or a girl being told that you are not pretty or handsome enough hurts the same.  Today many artist have made it their platform to try and break down these beauty and body standards. Beyonce and Colbie Caillat are among these artist that sing about the struggles with beauty and body image. Along with these artist more people are getting involved and making it their mission to help those that are battling with body image. Below are couple links and videos that will help you learn more about these issues.

 

http://www.medicaldaily.com/history-body-image-america-how-ideal-female-and-male-body-has-changed-over-time-360492

http://www.refinery29.com/2016/09/122795/barbie-body-image-effects

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/peggy-drexler/beauty-and-the-boy-the-im_b_2462766.html

https://youtu.be/GXoZLPSw8U8

https://youtu.be/0Lz6tYh4esY

https://youtu.be/LXXQLa-5n5w

 

Let’s Talk… Makeup!

 Posted by on Tue, 9/13 at 6:31pm  Uncategorized  No Responses »
Sep 132016
 

READ: Skim/read/consume at 10-20 items about your topic (news items, blog posts, newspaper/magazine articles, editorials, Wikipedia entries, paper abstracts, videos, new media, book reviews, web pages, etc.)—please choose a variety of genres.

This isn’t research; it’s reading. Get an idea of the nature of the topic, relevant history, related issues, past/current discussions, points of interest, areas of agreement/disagreement, etc. Your goal is to get an idea of what’s “out there” and gauge your knowledge about (and interest in) the topic.

WRITE: A summary of what you found—not everything—but a summary of the conversation. Who is talking? Where? How? In what ways? Please include a few links and/or titles of particularly interesting or representative texts and find/mention at least one scholarly/academic text.

Additional Notes:

  • Please write a sentence or two before your summary that identifies your topic/subject.
  • You should aim to write ~400-600 words (but more is fine if you have more to say!)
  • Post before class time on Wednesday, 9/14.

 

 

 

My topic is mainly about makeup in general, the good, the bad, and the downright ugly.

 

For my topic I was able to find a lot of youtube videos pertaining to makeup. The different types of makeup, the different application styles of makeup, and the different usage for makeup. One of my favorite makeup artist that I enjoy watching on YouTube is Kandee Johnson. She is able to make makeup tutorials for people that may not ever wear makeup. She does every day looks, Halloween, special occasion, cartoon inspired, you name it, she does it. She also has a lot of beauty hacks that anyone can benefit from. She makes video about product/clothing hauls. Hauls, are when people go out and buy several or more of their favorite items that they like on an everyday basis or that they liked at the time of shopping. My other favorite makeup artist that I enjoy watching and reading about is Jeffree Star. He is a popular internet sensation who became famous off of myspace for his overall look and his music. He is amazing at makeup and is also a role model for the LGBTQ community. He makes “haul” videos as well as makeup tutorials and his “monthly favorites”. Monthly favorites is exactly what you think it is. It is the blogger/vlogger’s (video blogger) favorite makeup or product that month. I find all of this vlogging and blogging about makeup and ways to apply makeup interesting in the sense that it is constantly evolving.

 

Mind you, these are two completely different people in the sense of how they portray themselves, who they are, their interests, and overall their language..

 

Just be prepared!

 

 

Here is a link for one of Kandee Johnson’s vids

 

And here is a link for Jeffree Star’s makeup vid

Sep 132016
 

My friend had recently came out to me about feeling out of place in his male body for literally his whole life. He feels he was meant to be born a woman. He isn’t someone that one would guess feels that way. He seemed to think like a man, move like a man, and have preferences of a man in the way we’re expected to associate those traits with. This got me thinking about tradition in gender roles, qualities, societal viewpoints, and the “feelings” attributed to being a woman or a man, and how it begins from before the child is even born. Once the sex is found out, a whole life is predicted by the parents based on that babies gender.

I’m a nanny for multiple ages, and have noticed the trend of gender socialization that the families surround the children with. We notice the baby boy dressed in blue. We notice the baby girl’s pacifier having a teddy bear attachment whereas the boy has a duck. How do we consider the duck to be masculine, whereas the teddy is feminine and how do we determine each attachment per gender? The family jokes about how the children will be when they’re older and discuss the activities that they will be involved in. The male children are already supposedly interested in contact sports, whereas the female children would prefer to dance or do art. Its as if we aren’t  created with the same mentality and physical skill set. We aren’t hunting woolly-mammoths, we’re doing activities we enjoy. 

Gender identity is displayed through clothing, hairstyle, activities, and other tangible things we notice. However, as a nanny i’ve gotten a closer glimpse at the response parents give to children based on gender. I watch twins, 17 months, one boy and one girl. He bites her. “George! NO!”. She bites him. “Penny….. (gives look of disapproval) and redirects her. It seems that females have a softer expectation whereas males seem to be expected, even at the age of a toddler!!!!!! to require more firmness? Or able and expected to handle a harsher explanation? Or for the parents to just see the sex of their baby and respond differently? 

The Jezebel article says “children picked up on cues given by their parents during play time, as fathers tended to encourage assertive behavior while mothers encouraged cooperation and fairness.” In response to a study done. It led me to wonder if these traits reside in different sexes because of the way kids were raised to act? Based on this portion from this study it would lead somebody to think that men learn to be more aggressive and women more compassionate over time through gender conditioning. It’s all weird humans are weird. I’m going to notice my behavior extra and see if I can differentiate anything based off of gender.

It also makes me question if people feel they belong to another gender because of the rules we’ve created for gender, or if its more biological. My friend said he’s known from a young age that something was different and then discovered it once he started middle school and then solidified when he dated women. It makes me wonder a lot of different things that my rambling brain can’t line up step by step!

 

https://www.healthychildren.org/English/ages-stages/gradeschool/Pages/Gender-Identity-and-Gender-Confusion-In-Children.aspx

http://www.parents.com/toddlers-preschoolers/development/behavioral/avoiding-gender-stereotypes/

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/news/kids-gender-roles/

http://jezebel.com/5561837/girls-are-pink-boys-are-blue-on-toddlers-and-gender-roles

http://gozips.uakron.edu/~susan8/parinf.htm

http://ehlt.flinders.edu.au/education/DLiT/2002/family/gender.htm

https://thinkprogress.org/forcing-kids-to-stick-to-gender-roles-can-actually-be-harmful-to-their-health-34aef42199f2#.fwlvp99q8

https://www.theguardian.com/lifeandstyle/womens-blog/2015/feb/23/sexist-assumptions-young-children-gender-stereotypes

Sep 132016
 
  • FOREWORD: I will be editing this for mistakes asap. I simply want to turn this in now in case any issues arise later and I can’t turn it in on time.

The topic of my concern for this summary is simple, yet complex: Business Ethics.

Perhaps not so much in pre-historical times, but, indeed, at the dawn of (written) history, alongside the pharaohs, the pillars and pyramids, the transactions of man begin to show themselves accounted for in great lengths in ancient civilizations such as those of the ever-enigmatic Ancient Egyptians and in Mesopotamia. The Law Code of Hammurabi, historically notorious for its eye-for-an-eye penal code, was the common law set by the Babylonian (Mesopotamian) ruler, Hammurabi, which, even upon a  brief skimming, one can see improper economic transactions (of slaves, damaged property, wives, etc.) often yielded a harsh punishment. “He shall be put to death,” is the mainstay punishment for most misdeeds. But what is to be done when all goes well in business? From those times of our ancients trading at distant bazaars, to Columbus “pitching” the Americas to his kingship, running forward onto today’s global capitalism, “money makes the world go round” is seems likely a phrase that may have a longer life-span than we may think.

It seems to be, though, that many would resist this idea; and why, exactly? The conversation is vast and largely endless. In a modern rendition of long-held critiques, YouTube video channel 8-Bit Philosophy presents us with the thought that money and monetary value, as critical as it can be society, should NOT replace society altogether; namely when anything and everything can have a value assigned to it. This can, and likely should be seen by many, be claimed to be WRONG. Alas, we have many individuals who have gone on the historical records as having ruthless business tactics in the days of modern American industrialization, such as Cornelius Vanderbilt and Andre Carnegie, and, in more recent times, say, Starbucks. These individuals and companies have put others out of business; misfortunes like this are ever the reminder that the game of business can at times have a very cruel side to it: competition. For those who decry loses of their wealth at the hands of the “free market”, government-businesses also come into play (let us not forget that we pay the government for their services). In attempts to not destroy the business-class altogether in the realization of some possibly vexing loses, there are moderates like the late Harvard Professor John Rawls, who, in his book “A Theory of Justice” argue for governments to aid with the money they receive from citizens’ taxes to create a system that has competition between businesses, but also makes room for and encourages cooperation. When the morally troublesome problems of business are viewed from the broad scope of considering business but exchange-agreements between individuals, all sorts of things are left to say about it. Some see the corporation as a “legal entity” liable as a person in the eyes of the court; consumer protection laws have been established in the US and elsewhere, but that hasn’t stopped the relatively significant amount of misinformation one can hear and see regulation on marketing material; and, most controversial in this era, are all the endless amount of discourse on the subject of “buying power”; I’m talking about non-governmental business paying out to the government. But some organizations, for example, who fight to keep big businesses out of their locus, they can be said to harm those in the area in need of a job. The meat for this topic is big and inexpensive, and in so far as everyone can have their piece and pose their opinions on the rights and wrongs of business, I am inspired to do the same, by first listening to them all, with hopes that I’ll come out with something perhaps more enlightened than to say, “Business is bad, always has been, and always will be,” as it seems to be the sentiment of many people not playing in the big leagues (mostly my people) today.

Girls in Society

 Posted by on Sun, 9/11 at 11:45pm  Uncategorized  No Responses »
Sep 112016
 

My topic is about sexualization of women in society. The problem is that the media(magazines, TV, advertisements), men, and society have ideals of what women should look like(body), act, dress in public. Women face this issue everyday. Women have faced this issue since they were 6-12 years old. When girls are growing up they play with Barbies, not realizing that these dolls hold a superficial and un-realistic image of women’s bodies. The Barbies have tiny waists and big boobs. Nowadays, girls grow up with Bratz dolls who are way sexualized for girls who are 6. These dolls have full makeup on, their lips are usually large, and have short skirts. It does not portray a positive image for young girls. Sometimes it’s not the girls’ fault when it comes to succumbing to sexualization of girl’s bodies at a young age sometimes it’s the parent’s doing. We see this in shows, such as, Toddlers and Tiaras. In the show, 2-5 year olds run in a beauty pageant. The little girls look like 12. The mom cakes on the makeup, curls and hairspray, flippers(dentures for kids), whoreish costumes you only see in halloween. You just see the moms in the stands cheering on the daughter and getting way into it. It is the parent that shoves and pushes the child to do the pageant. The moms get extremly upset when their daughters don’t get 1st and the little girls are just happy making new friends and eating candy. It is scary to see these moms and what they are doing to these girls and it develops issues in child development. These little girls don’t have a chance at being kids. At younger ages, girls are introduced to adult sexuality and objectifying. When girls reach puberty they want to explore with makeup, short skirts, shaving their legs, new hair, heels, etc.. not knowing that this is a product/result of society expectations of them(mostly men). They are a product of society. Girls get ideas of how to dress by looking at magazines and advertisements and TV shows. They compare their bodies with these models who are 5’9+ and skinny. The girls then develop self-esteem issues, eating disorders and even depression. Statistics show that Ninety-five percent of those with eating disorders are between the ages of 12 and 25.
Statistics also show that women are much more likely than men to develop an eating disorder. They yearn to change their bodies to be like these women and this behavior can lead to depression as well. TV shows such as “Keeping up with the Kardashians” do not help with girls’ self image because these girls are all plastic. The show shows the three daughters: Khloe, Kylie and Kim who have exaggerated on surgeries it seems like. Khloe has a huge butt and big lips, Kim has the big breasts and Kylie has also followed their sisters’ path and got a nose job and lip fillers(went horribly wrong). These girls prove that this is what women  should look like and what guys want. We also see Kourtney’s boyfriend (ex now), Scott over emphasize their sex life on the show. He keeps asking her to have sex and it makes viewers think that this is normal behavior and expected of men and  girls have to accept this to be in “happy and lasting relationships”. Especially when it’s a little girl’s role model and they look up to these girls then their whole up-bringing/behavior can change because they want to imitate someone of high status and trend. It’s not just in the media that we see this sexualization trends in girls. We also see more and more women on Facebook and Instagram posting their weight loss journey for everyone to see. While I think it’s great to celebrate losing 10 pounds or whatever it just makes it an uncomfortable post because these girls usually post their pictures in little booty shorts and a sports bra or worse, a  bikini. They are exposing/exploiting their bodies. This also can reflect that they have bad low self esteem and are seeking attention from others(strangers) to feel good. A study conducted in Brunel University in London stated that people who post about  accomplishments are more narcissistic. Narcissistic people broadcast the effort they put into their physical appearance for all to see and envy. With 50 likes on a picture it boosts confidence. The only problem is that men post on these kind of pictures and they are not celebrating women’s weight loss journey but rather their butt and legs. The girls who post their weight loss journey then get upset that men are leaving such crude comments. Umm.. what did you expect? You posted it to show off your new body so this is what you can expect from men. I don’t think women realize what audience they are attracting with these posts. The more that men objectify women as just sexual objects than this can effect the way men and women communicate. One study shows that when men are checking a girl out(focusing on body part), the girl picks up on that and it dehumanizes/degrades them. It creates distance between the man and woman. Men fail to interact and deal with emotions and only value their appearance and little else. It also is quite interesting that such honored professions such as nurse and teacher are being sexualized by men. As women increase power in society the possibilities of equality for women have been met with oppositional reactions intended to maintain men’s dominance. The widespread of media images of highly sexualized women is hypothesized to maintain men’s dominance by designating women’s bodies as property that can be evaluated, looked at, and touched at the impulse of men’s desire.

http://www.apa.org/pi/women/programs/girls/report-full.pdf

http://www.cnn.com/2011/09/12/opinion/henson-toddlers-tiaras/

https://storify.com/solelylo_/the-negative-side-of-bratz-dolls

http://www.sciencedirect.com.ezproxy.fau.edu/science/article/pii/S1740144516301577 (Journal article,peer reviewed)

https://www.quora.com/What-exactly-is-wrong-with-men-objectifying-women

Barbie Lead Designer Blames Moms, Not Doll’s Crazy Proportions, for Girls’ Body Issues

http://www.cosmopolitan.com/entertainment/a55017/kim-kardashian-naked-selfie-empowerment/

http://womenandadvertising.weebly.com/women-as-sexual-objects.html

http://allnurses.com/general-nursing-discussion/where-did-the-243308.html

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/darryl-roberts/sexualized-culture-is-creating-mental-health-issues-in-our-youth_b_5994148.html

Shocker: Science Says People Who Post About Their Workout on Facebook Are Narcissists

Concise, confusing, colloquy

 Posted by on Sun, 9/11 at 9:52pm  Uncategorized  No Responses »
Sep 112016
 

To summarize my topic in a few hundred words is going to be difficult because I’m not really sure what my topic is going to be yet. However I did my reading on Words and specifically word aversion and the  concept of word aversion in American Sign Language.

 

Words are a essential part of our social beings. More than words is the concept of language. My research started in a video on words and specifically bad words. It is said that Marchex did a study in 2013 on conversations done in call centers throughout the year. They realized that people in Ohio cursed the most on those calls saying F*** and Sh** the most, while Washington State said the least amount of profane words. Then the vlogger went into the how in the 1600-1800’s when you were to curse using the Lords name it was said that you physically injured Him. This led to the idea of different levels of Sociability, ie  using the word defecate vs sh**. One is used in a medical professional setting, while one has become a vulgar word used in everyday language. This turned into a comparative look on words in society, looking back to old English when it was the difference in society that defined the language you spoke. For example low class would call their meet by the animal name, chicken or cow, while upper class would say poultry or beef. This led to looking into society and how we change the meaning of words or even make words more or less acceptable. For example, how sex and profanity are becoming more acceptable, while identity, religion and pronoun usage is becoming more unacceptable. This led me to the topic I think I am going to continue researching which is word aversion which is an intense and irrational disgust for a particular word or phrase, for me the word is moist..I really cannot stand the word moist. This led me to a book called Forbidden signs which had a topic discussed by Professor Benjamin Pettingill who has been doing research on aversion in American Sign Language. He says that Sign Language aversion comes with the “Natural Language” that comes with Sign Language, which can be described as facial expressions, countenance, and involuntary muscle movement. This means that the aversion comes with the facial expression paired with the actual sign. This video is a good example of sign paired with facial expression with aversion because it shows the emotion behind the sign, you know exactly how the song emotions should be heard. (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Zdly3HBnj-s) However take a look at this video, he has no facial expression so honestly if i didnt know sign language I would have no idea what he was trying to say.(https://www.signingsavvy.com/sign/DISGUST/3301/1) Professor Pettingill says that went as far to say that you cannot have a sign language without the natural language. The fact that word aversion does not come natural in ASL is pretty interesting, only when it is paired with a facial expression or an element of Natural Language can it have some sort of word aversion.

Sep 092016
 

There have been only a few instances throughout my life that i have been self motivated to write because, who has time for such things? Usually motivation for writing, for me, comes from a grade. Sure there have been plenty of times that i have been interested in what it is that i was writing for an assignment and it became easy and quite honestly, a down-write pleasure. and yea, other times it’s just a big ole pain in the ass, but i gotta get through it. But aside from being assigned writing, the only other time i feel the need to pick up a pen and write is when i’ve experienced something too big for me to wrap my whole head around. there can be huge variety to this. It could be something like an actual incident that occurred in my life, one that hasn’t yet occurred and may never, questions i have about what it is that’s happening in the day to day life going on around me, or even questions i have in myself or about myself that i either have or don’t have the answers to. And do you think i stop there? Typically i try to (though i’m not always successful) because aside from my basic mantra of a mixture between everyone in the world IS equal and deserves to be treated fairly and also that life is NOT fair, I typically reject the notion that focusing outward does me as much good as focusing closer to myself and the loved ones that surround me.

Writing for me, is like a great organizer of thoughts. it makes me feel more comfortable and able to take on life when i can write out what i know, what i think i know, what i think i want to know, and what i’m ignorant of. in a way, writing forces me to reflect on myself and this helps me to become an improved version of myself. this reflection also aides me in finding possible answers to my questions in a way that i would never be able to accomplish if i just kept it all inside my head. This is why writing is good for me and i need to participate in the activity far more than i do right now. Good thing I’m in Advanced Exposition!

Sep 092016
 

The analogy of childhood curiosity in comparison to the situational curiosity in adulthood is an interesting way to approach the planning phase of a paper. I initially thought of the children I nanny and their never-ending questions and the excitement behind them. I liked how Ballenger included this because planning a paper is normally somewhat stressful for me simply because I feel concerned over if the topic is worthwhile or can allow for a smooth writing process. I also get overwhelmed because my mind works best step by step, and at first the process is all big-picture and I’m unsure of where to begin. He/she explained it in a way that came across as natural, as in, one really should just be pretty stoked about a topic, and have the dedication to it to explore that topic. It’s an easier approach to phrase it that way.

Reid suggests that anything worth being good at takes some time and that there is always room for improvement. This relates to our writing process because often I feel I’m rushing to meet a word count, or I’m writing inbetween other obligations and am unable to really consider everything on my paper. I interpreted his suggestion in relation to writing as creating the time to plan, plan even more, proofread, revise, plan again, and make sure it is improving at each step. I enjoy writing. I can’t do a simple math problem, but I can get a long paper done pretty quickly. This method relates to his part about extrinsic motivation due to grades and deadlines, because we’ll often rush an assignment knowing we can complete it, but it doesn’t truly represent our capabilities.

Both articles discuss that the audience and purpose is important to consider. We must consider the point that we’re trying to explain, as well as whom we’d ideally explain it to so we know how to phrase and organize our thoughts and style. Reid’s position within his or her blog is different than a student writing for a dissertation because there is more expected freedom on a blog, and less expectation for structure and academically advanced writing. Ballenger’s approach is transient between different writing styles and audiences because either way, one needs to consider an audience, and either way, picking an intriguing topic creates a sort of mental game for the writer to get excited about Ballenger also discusses working knowledge, and states it as something one can talk more than a minute about without repetition. Reid talks about vast content on the internet and the easy access that blogs allow for. We learn from the information we ingest whether forced or not, but what about the information we freely produce without the threat of a bad grade, or the ideal of a good one?

I really, deeply enjoy writing poetry and vignettes. It stays in my notebook and it’s only for my eyes, so it’s solely for intrinsic purposes. Once I start writing my hand just continues on the paper and doesn’t even seem to be guided by my brain. It’s like an auto-pilot. It’s exciting, and it’s an insightful experience to re-read what comes out so naturally. Sometimes I’m surprised at what finds its way to paper from my mind because I didn’t even know I felt so intensely about something until I begin to write. It slows my thoughts down. I feel like they’re always in constant motion, and its a little wild because one would think while writing that the brain is being used most, yet it seems that it’s one of the few quiet times. Super strange.

I understand both author’s purpose of writing each of their articles is to explain the type of interaction with writing that I explained above. A strong passion with a little bit of tenderness for the topic. Where it comes from a deeper place than just mulling over an article and instigating forced brain activity to get some words on paper until the count is reached. Being attached to the topic would seemingly create a more involved writing process and final outcome for the writer to be more satisfied with.

Sep 092016
 

I feel that the questions that Reid provides are a good starting place to start thinking about writing. One can’t just begin to write without thinking something. For instance, before I began writing this post, I knew where it would go and who would read it, and that influenced how this post is written. I am writing more formally than I would if I were texting someone because this more formal form of writing is what is expected of writers writing in academia. If someone is just writing for fun and does not intend for anyone to read what they are writing, then the author is the audience and this directly effects the way the author is writing. This leads into Reid’s second question: the purpose for writing. To me, the purpose and the audience are directly related. It wouldn’t make sense for someone to write an argumentative paper that is pro choice for an audience that is pro choice. Sure, the paper may present new research or statistics or something of use to the audience, but the goal of an argumentative paper is change someone’s perspective. It is impossible to change someone’s perspective to a perspective that they already possess. So, there is a link between the audience and the purpose of one’s writing. This ties into the third question Reid gives: what is the genre and its conventions? One has to know the genre that they are writing in and how the genre is written. Returning to the example of someone who is writing for fun, their genre could be considered freestyle or informal writing or what ever they want to consider it. This reminds me of a YouTube series entitled “UNHhhh,” where RuPaul’s Drag Race stars Trixie Mattel and Katya start out every episode by saying, “… the show were we talk about whatever we want because its our show and not yours.” If you’re writing for fun, it’s your writing and you can write how ever you want and you can write about whatever you want. However, going back to the example of writing an argumentative paper that is pro choice, the author must know the conventions of the argumentative genre. If they do not, they might not be able to create as strong an argument as someone who does know the conventions of the genre.

Ballenger presents the concept of creating an “interest inventory” which I find to be an interesting concept. It seems to me that it can be very useful in drafting a paper or deciding on a topic. It seems promising but I do see flaws in using this. The main one is that it will probably generate garbage. Although there might be a hidden gem somewhere in the list, there’s more than likely not. Just spewing out random stuff may lead to an interesting and colorful train of thought, but there needs to be some bounds of thought to create a viable topic. For me, the fault is exemplified in the example given: teeth whiting. I can agree that research on teeth whiting is perfectly valid, but I don’t see it becoming a thing unless the author is taking dental courses or a course that call for such a topic. In my writing experience, I do not think this is a concept that I would have ever applied when trying to decide on a topic. Creating lists and asking questions for research is definitely something I have done, just not in the way that Ballenger is suggesting.

Sep 092016
 

Writing can be both stressful and rewarding, and I believe the trick, and the idea behind both Reid and Ballenger’s articles, is discovering how to minimize the stress of writing while maximizing the reward. For a period of my life before entering high school, writing was fun and I kept a fairly consistent schedule of writing short stories. I did it not for the love of words or of the English language, but as an outlet for pent up creativity, which, when I found a way to express on the page filled me with the satisfaction that I created something that I (while perhaps not a more refined individual) could proudly call art. And that’s what creative short fiction was for me, it wasn’t just about conjuring up plots and characters and settings, it was about expression, about a message. Every story I wrote had a moral, and I felt like a better person for expressing them. And for me that was my exigency, the desire to express concepts I felt were meaningful and which in my young and optimistic head just might make my reader a little bit better of a person. And in that since, I’ve never really considered developing and answering “rhetorical questions” like those listed by Reid. The question, “What is my purpose?” has always been for me the most frequently considered question when it came to writing (of any variety, academic, creative, etc…) whereas the audience has only hardly concerned me. Sure, when writing for a course grade, the professor as your audience is an important thing to consider, but in every other sense, I always assumed my audience would be anyone interested in what I’ve written. If an individual isn’t interested in what I have to say, he or she probably isn’t reading what I have to say.

At one point in my life, around high school’s freshman year, I found myself approaching writing from a new, more restrained angle. Increasingly writing became and academic exercise, and increasingly I felt my affinity for writing dwindle little by little. And while the first thing anybody who knows me will tell you about me is that I have always had an aversion to computer technology and all things web-based, Reid’s ideals about blogging were in a small way attractive to me. I’ve always longed for that joy of writing that I experienced as a kid, and Reid offers a solution (and a solution, in any form, is an attractive concept) yet I find myself still unconvinced by the concept of blogging. The internet as an audience frightens me, I worry about frequently unnoticed spelling and grammatical errors and whether my readers will find me dull, unintelligent or uninteresting. Ballenger was far more appealing, a concept that may surprise you given my affinity for the more creative and less academic side of writing. He showed in a convincing way how research can be not only a knowledge driven academic venture, but a truly creative enterprise as well. I thought that was a neat concept. Further, the essay rather than the blog, can be written, rewritten, revised and edited over a period of time that in my mind should weed out embarrassing errors and allow me to express what I want to express. And while in my youth creative writing had moralizing purpose, I believe the intellectual purpose behind research is just as noble. Readers will become better people by becoming more knowledgeable people.