Oct 162016
 

Titan is Saturn’s largest moon, and the second largest moon in the solar system, following Jupiter’s Galilean moon Ganymede. Titan is so large that it is actually slightly larger than the smallest planet in the solar system, Mercury. Besides our own Moon, and the four Galilean moons of Jupiter, Titan is among the earliest discovered moon in the solar system, first detected in 1655. The moon was first viewed up close in 1980 by Voyager 1, but came under intense scrutiny in the mid-2000’s when it was being studied by the Cassini-Huygens space probe. Outwardly, the moon is interesting because unlike other moons, it is covered in a very thick honey-colored atmosphere, so thick in fact, that it is nearly impossible to see the moon’s surface features from outside its atmosphere. This is surprising because generally smaller celestial bodies, even bodies the size of Mars, are thought to be unable to support a thick atmosphere because their gravity levels are so low. Titan, however, can support an atmosphere four times as dense as Earth’s because it is so cold. The surface temperature averages at about -289 degrees fahrenheit, and as the gas molecules are not moving very rapidly, they do not overcome Titan’s gravity and leave the moon.

But what is more interesting about Titan’s atmosphere is that it is 98% nitrogen. Compare this with Earth’s 78.1% nitrogen atmosphere. While Titan may lack the oxygen level’s of Earth’s atmosphere, both bodies share an atmosphere with nitrogen as it’s base. But similarities between these two atmosphere’s go a big step further. Within Titan’s atmosphere clouds of ethane and methane sometimes accumulate, and from time to time these clouds precipitate, releasing rain in the form of liquid ethane and methane. Violent rainstorms on Titan are responsible for the formation of huge lakes – complete with bays, inlets and islands – that are often larger than Earth’s five Great Lakes. These seas create an earth-like terrain; valleys and channels cut by running liquid mark the surface, and stones which on Mars, Mercury or our Moon would be jagged and lumpy are round and smooth on Titan due to rain weathering. Titan’s terrain also lacks the craters which are so often the staple of extraterrestrial surfaces. Scientist’s theorize that this owes itself to Titan’s relative youth geologically. If this is true, it is not difficult then to think of Titan then as similar to what Earth may have been like in its early youth. Because Ethane and Methane are hydrocarbons (Hydrogen: one of the building blocks of water, + Carbon: the main building block of all life on Earth), life on Titan seems viable, if not already existent in microbial form. Either way, Titan in every sense except it’s excessively cold conditions, seems to be what scientists think of when they imagine a young planet with conditions in which life could potentially evolve.

READING: On The UN-Leaderly (Oct. 16)

 Posted by on Sun, 10/16 at 8:35pm  reading  No Responses »
Oct 162016
 

A brief treatment of authority figures I will do. Do I loose credibility for breaking the standard Subject-Verb-Object syntactical convention of the English language? If so, I’d like to propose an alternative. What if we lived in a world where our leaders where WRONG? That is to say, what if the people who we’ve most recognized (at least those of us cognizant enough to do so sometime in our lives) as the primary guiders for our conduct and thinking were not the desirable? Hitler, ever discussed about in literature about leadership, had the turn of people’s whims like this. A misguided authority only tells us who assigned him such a position of our own follies. Sure, it’s been true and acknowledge far back as Biblical times and very much likely long before, that man is not the almighty. One person I have looked towards for some insight is world-renowned, U.S . political critic and MIT Professor Noam Chomsky; in an interview posted in democracynow.com, he admitted (along with some who shared his opinion) that he was wrong about Bernie Sanders (who I believe he Chomsky thought he wasn’t as different on his political stance as some thought he was [i.e. being a kind of democratic radical]). This was a kind of relief for me, because although I believed he had some issues in some of his arguments, it was a kind of “full-circle” moment to know he admitted one himself. Where I’d like to go is this: what would leadership be like if our leaders admitted to being more faulty than we think they are or that they present to themselves to be. Could “leadership” be possible in such a cognition awakened to the fact of human fallibility? (side note: it’s also interesting to think about why humans imagined themselves as being “right” [or wrong] at all).

Here is where some might point to Christ, as in, Jesus Christ, but was he the leader admitting fault in and of himself? Some would say although we cast light on the many errors that humans make, he was more a figurehead for the real leader than a leader in and of himself, and if I’m not mistaken (although I absolutely could be, I haven’t read or researched much on the Bible [though I should just google this uncertainty for an answer]) God never admitted fault of his ways or asked anyone for forgiveness or the like for errors made, no? As expect from short research, the answers aren’t clear. However, if we ask Niccolo Machiavelli, he would tell us to go f’ ourselves and further consolidate his power by punishing us; that’s a double whammy for mankind, maybe even a triple whammy for Machiavelli himself.

I have seen that much room is made for authorities who recognize their errors, except perhaps in science very quietly for the few in the masses who recognize error is part of the process for establishing truths. Someone once told me that the best authority is one for no authority. Is this like anarchy? Or like the Governor Veto/2016 Libertarian Presidential candidate, Gary Johnson? I’ve not come to a conclusion on these things, though I hope that bringing to light the component of humility and honesty in leaderly affairs might lead us to one day we can all be leader, and all are, which should simultaneously empower us to do more together….

Or would did this just encourage us to designate some as more leaderly than others, like today, and nothing changes? I don’t know. I will ponder the answers, as too the questions.

 

Sources read concerning God’s mistake making:

  1. https://gotquestions.org/does-God-make-mistakes.html
  2. https://lifehopeandtruth.com/god/who-is-god/genesis-6/
  3. http://rationalwiki.org/wiki/List_of_mistakes_made_by_God

Cat-calling is not okay

 Posted by on Sun, 10/16 at 7:38pm  reading  No Responses »
Oct 162016
 

I was walking around the mall the other day and got cat called twice. Mind you, I was wearing jeans and  a tanktop(no cleavage). I got two responses: “Damn, girl!” or “Wow!” I find that it’s older men, un-educated men and men in low socio-economic that partake in catcalling. Now I don’t really get why men feel the need to express  these thoughts out loud. I see really cute guys all the time and do not express these thoughts to them. How awkward would that be? Why do men do it then? Is it attention? Ego?  Do they really think women will smile and initiate conversation and exchange numbers? Some guys say that women should take cat-calling as flattering and as a compliment. I’m not so sure about that… It does not empower women-mentally, emotionally, or spiritually. Getting cat called is not sexy or a fun time. It makes me feel dirty. It is very predator like and so creepy. I’m no prude, but what makes you think it’s okay to talk to women this way? Men feel entitled and think they are in power by stripping a little bit of ours away. That is not okay. Men say these things for a reason. It’s all about sexual attraction.  Women who might be insecure about their bodies might like the attention while others who are confident in their bodies will know better. Cat-calling is an example of normalizing sexualization in our culture. It actually encourages sexual harassment and promotes rape culture. It degrades women from a human being to a sex object. Something you can just pick up from the street. It is un-wanted attention. If it is un-wanted, why do they think we like being cat-called? Sometimes there are no spoken comments. Sometimes cat-calling comes in forms of honking at at a girl or whistling at them. It is un-wanted attention. We do not need your validation to tell us we are pretty. We already know that. You emphasizing/commenting on our beauty just makes you disgusting. Sometimes men lack the emotional side and just act out on their sexual instincts. But cat-calling is not the answer. There always better ways. If you want my attention or even get a girl, for that matter, don’t cat call. Be normal. Grow up and be a man. If you are genuinely interested, be respectful and polite. Smile and strike up a conversation.

I have been dealing with cat-calls since I was a teen. It’s not cute. I will not get over it. Guys will never understand what we go through. They do not realize how their behavior and words affect us.

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/stefanie-williams/no-dudes-catcalling-isnt-flattering_b_5691949.html

http://www.forharriet.com/2016/01/the-politics-of-being-ugly-in-between.html#axzz4NI7iefBj

 

In Other Hair News

 Posted by on Sun, 10/16 at 5:53pm  reading  No Responses »
Oct 162016
 

This week I focused on natural hair in the news. The first article I came across, involved a school in Louisville, Kentucky that banned certain natural hairstyles, including dreadlocks, twists, Afros longer than two inches and cornrows. Further proof of the ignorance was that they misspelled cornrows in the new policy as “Corn Rolls.” After the policy became a viral tweet, state legislators contacted the school and the policy was then removed. When asked for a response the school said the policy was simply about neat grooming not offending a culture. The policy has now been changed to “hair must be well-groomed, well-kept and at a reasonable length.”
The next article I read was again revolving a young girl this time 5 years old. Her mother takes care to keep her hair healthy. This includes styling hair with coconut oil. This is an organic hair solution that is known to many as the holy grail of natural hair. Well when this 5 year old girl went to her kindergarten class she came home with a note from the teacher. The note was asking the mother to withhold the application of coconut oil because it is a distraction to the students, but the teacher also said the reason for the note was so the other students would not make fun of her. The mother was angry with the note especially since her daughter is the only black girl in the class. The mother posted the note on social media and it went viral. Coconut oil has a faint smell but not one that is so pungent it is considered “distracting.” The teacher received backlash for blaming the victim and not the bullies. She should have addressed the students poking fun at the girl instead of writing a letter to the mother who is trying to instill a sense of self love in her child. After investigation of the incident it was revealed that none of the children complained about the smell and that the complaints actually came only from the teacher. The news article shows that natural hair is misunderstood.

Oct 162016
 

In the United  States of America women who are not 116 to 120 pounds are not considered beautiful. Every time we are on line shopping, or doing some research even when it is not related to weight loss we are always confronted with the obsession that women have to be skinny. Skinny models, or celebrities who have the perfect shape for the cover of a magazine or TV are always being praised for their beauty but the fat or overweight celebrities like Gabby Gabourey are always bullied and only recognized for their size. This was also the case with Miss Universe, Alicia Machado who was bullied by Donald Trump because she gained some weight after she received the crown and according to him she looked like “Ms piggy” he said she needed to lose the weight if not her crown was going to be taken from her and she was going to lose her job. From an early age women are stressed out about how their bodies should look, what they need to eat and how many times they need to work out in order to look the way society believes is the perfect body image. As women mature their bodies go through many different hormonal changes and it seems that the worst time for a woman to accept is the pregnancy stage. The body will change for many women and in many cases the changes are not embraced because of all the negativity women face throughout the pregnancy and postpartum if the weight is not dropped as quickly as Kate Middleton who lost all her baby weight only 4 weeks after giving birth. It is very important to know that being morbid obese should not be a celebrating matter, that is not the intention of my reading. The point is that the public should back off and stop pressuring women who are encountering a difficult time getting back to their normal size after they give birth. Women who are obese run the risk of developing different medical conditions such as: diabetes, high blood pressure, gallstones, gall bladder disease and heart disease.  This is well noted, but women should be encouraged through other means to lose weight not by constantly being reminded that they are not beautiful because they are not a size 4.

☾OE✡IS †

 Posted by on Sun, 10/16 at 1:52pm  reading  No Responses »
Oct 162016
 

While continuing to google my way through this topic, I came across a particulary interesting article throwing shade at those nice little bumper stickers you stumble upon in a “Trader Joe’s parking lot.” Judging by the title alone, COEXIST’s Bonehead Bumper-Sticker Politics, you can probably tell what direction the writer, Michael Schulson, is going to take this.

He starts off the article by addressing that the COEXIST bumper sticker is no different than than likes of “NRA decals, cartoon families, and (the) blatant ‘26.2’ ovals” in the sense that it is one of the most popular (and most obnoxious) ways for “Americans to broadcast their worldviews in one word or less.” He suggests that the people that post these stickers up for tailgaters to see are naive to the issues stopping the parties from coexisting. Schulson points to the unrest stemming from religious organization across the globe including ISIS, China’s cultural control over Tibet, Buddhists in Sri Lanka, Islamophobics, and the civil war-esq fighting between Christians and Muslims in Africa. He then goes on to wag a critisizing finger at “Americans asking these people to just get along.”

The main point that he works up to is that, while it may seem like a nice and harmless gesture, the coexist bumper sticker is a little counter productive in that it takes more to promote peace than simply slapping a sticer on your car and calling it a day; just like the cure for cancer isn’t hid inside a ribbon. It takes work, education, and a look back through history. “After all, there is only one sure-fire message that I can send by putting a Coexist sticker on the back of my car. Namely, that I am the type of person who puts a Coexist bumper sticker on my car.”

http://www.thedailybeast.com/articles/2014/12/21/coexist-s-bonehead-bumper-sticker-politics.html

Proud of an imperfect postpartum body

 Posted by on Sun, 10/16 at 12:15am  reading  No Responses »
Oct 162016
 

We can go as far back to the 19th and 20th century when women were not as privileged to have all the medical and technological advances that we have today, in order to avoid complications during and after child birth. During this research for this journal I have to admit that I was shocked to learn about all the risks women endured back in the days in order to have a child. Lets begin by mentioning that many women suffered for what is known “child bed fever” this consisted of women suddenly getting uncontrollable high fevers after giving birth and possibly dying due to the lack of antibiotics. Other infections such as the uterine infection which could easily spread through the entire body, and the incomplete expulsion of the placenta were all risks that women were more susceptible of encountering if they had a baby. Lets also remember vaginal trauma, tears and episiotomy the surgical cut in the muscular area between the vagina and the anus to enlarge the opening was a frequent procedure back in the day. Prolapse(Organs begin to fall out of place) and fistulas (a hole that develops in the tissue separating the rectum from the vagina, or, more commonly, the bladder from the vagina), were also common issues women faced when having a baby. And than we have C-sections, which are popular now a days but were very scary in the past because they were usually done on dead mothers not to save the mom but as a last resort to save the baby. With the advance in medicine more interesting facts and knowledge have arise in order to save the mother and the child when a C-section is done. Doctors understand the importance of sterilization antibiotics and the most important procedure which is to stitch up the uterus after the the C-section something that doctors did not know back in the days. The women who suffered the most of post-partum trauma were physically and emotionally were slaves, the working poor, and the illiterate; in other words, the backbones of society. The history of what women went through in the past has been ignored in the 21st century, now a days women do not embrace their scared bodies or their imperfect bodies after having a child because many are too worried about what other women are doing in order to get rid of the baby bump or baby weight. Nor realizing that giving birth is a lot more than following celebrities on social media or trying to fit back in name brand clothes.

History’s Postpartum Bodies

Oct 152016
 

         This week every other article or news report in the media was about presidential nominee Donald Trump and his objectification of women. Hearing all of his misogynistic comments about young girls and women made me realize that he is an advocate for social beauty standards.Trump not only sexualizes women he also  judges and classifies women based on their physical appearance.

          Trump like many other people in society prefer to hire someone who is considered “attractive” rather then someone who has the qualifications for a specific job. In a 2007 appearance in San Fransisco Donal Trump said, ” She’s so beautiful. And my people came and she said, “Mr. Trump, she has no experience.” So I interviewed her anyway because she was so pretty. And I said, “Let me ask you, do you have any experience?” She goes, “No, sir.” I say, “When can you start?,” this in regards to a seventeen/eighteen year old woman. This is not the only time that Trump has used someones “level of attractiveness” to convey whether or not they are capable of working for him. According to an article on CNN Trump, wanted to fire female employees he thought of as unattractive and replace them with better-looking women at a golf resort he owned. It is reported that Trumps standard for beauty made management rotate scheduling so that the most “attractive” employees would work when Mr. Trump would come around. His value for beauty among female employees caused managers to value appearance over skill when making hiring and staffing decisions. 

          Until recently Donald Trump was the owner of the Miss Universe beauty pageant. In this beauty pageant women represent their home country and compete for the prestigious title of Miss Universe. In the year 1996 Alicia Machado, representative of Venezuela was crowned the most beautiful women in the world however her dream of being Miss Universe soon came to an assailing halt because of Donald Trump. Alicia states in an interview with CNN’s Anderson Cooper that Trump called her “Miss Piggy” and that he was very cruel and mean to her. Donal Trump defends himself by saying that “She was the winner and you know, she gained a massive amount of weight and it was a real problem. We had a real problem.” Alicia says that this caused her to have negative body issues and resulted in her developing serious eating disorders. 

         Donald Trump has a social platform that many people would kill for. However his views on beauty standards are only creating a larger barrier between realistic beauty standards and his cloud nine standards. What society (including Mr.Trump) doesn’t understand when it comes to beauty standards is that every person is built differently. Setting up beauty standards for society in which it conveys our capabilities upon anything is wrong. How do you tell a child that depending on their physical appearance they may or may not be able to be or do what they want. How do you tell someone that their voice will only matter if they are “pretty” enough. In a land where we are suppose to be free we are being enslaved to the conception of a standard  that is said to be  conceptualized in the eye of the beholder. If Mr. Trump becomes president to this already great nation we will no longer ask for resumes but for head shots. 

http://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2016/09/trump-youre-hired/502136/

http://www.cnn.com/2016/09/27/politics/alicia-machado-donald-trump-2016-election-anderson-cooper/index.html

 

http://www.cnn.com/2016/09/29/politics/donald-trump-golf-club-lawsuit-female-employees/

 

 

The media and self image

 Posted by on Thu, 10/13 at 9:41pm  reading  No Responses »
Oct 132016
 

The media has become one of society’s biggest way to show off a person’s body, clothing and social status. It is important to note that my topic is about how the media affects pregnant women after giving birth, but i think that it is very important to understand that the media is affecting how people in general feel about their bodies and looks around the world. Teenagers for example, are one of the biggest victims of social media because they have to look a certain way in order to be excepted by their friends. Kids have confessed that they are not happy with their image and so they will alter their selfies in order to get the most likes. for the most part these kids are a shame and unhappy even if there is nothing wrong with them. Some will go to the extreme to stop eating because they have created in their minds that they are fat when in fact they are not. Others would purchase expensive clothing, shoes and accessories and would alter the photos to exaggerate their looks to the images they believe people will accept. Researchers and professionals are very concern about the impact that social media has among people in general. Campaigns like “Be real: Body confidence for everyone” wants to reiterate the importance for teenagers to love themselves and understand that social media is not the way to build their confidence and self esteem. Instead Social media can create other emotional and even mental issues which can lead to other issues if not taken care of in time. One of the best ways to fight against on line bulling and others negative views is by surrounding themselves with positive people and narrowing down the amount of people or social media apps a person has.

 

 

 

http://www.bbc.com/news/health-29569473

The Peoples Voice

 Posted by on Thu, 10/13 at 3:56pm  reading  No Responses »
Oct 132016
 

In a video by I am Other, a man interviews people in an urban city in the episode Stereotypes: Hipsters. The channel on Youtube is dedicated to discussing the people in our communities that don’t define themselves as normal, but the Others. The viewer interviews a wide range of people in this city, from shopkeepers to the homeless. He also talks to young people who fit the stereotype of the hipster themselves. The interviewer sheds light on the stereotypes that surround hipsters and anyone who stands out in a city. He gathers the opinions of others and sometimes uses triggers to get a reaction out of them. He does a great job of using words like “Trust fund baby” to trigger responses from the people he interviews and as we can see it isn’t hard to find out what people really think about hipsters. He goes up to people and asks them what the difference is between them and a hipster, if they know any stereotypes about hipsters or if they are in fact a hipster.

The tone of the video seems a little sardonic and comedic, but the message shines through that people hold serious stereotypes about hipsters. The interviewer himself dresses like a hipster in order to ‘trigger’ some of the comments he gets from the people he talks to.

In another video by I am Other, the interviewer goes to London for another episode about hipsters. In Stereotypes: Hipsters vs. Chavs, the interviewer talks to others about Chavs, a movement very similar to Hipsters. The interviewer is less sardonic with the people he talks to and gets more answers to the questions he’s asking. He asks people to describe both Hipsters and Chavs, compare them and to list some of the stereotypes associated with them.

A lot of the people don’t realize that the interviewer is mostly joking with them and they tend to reveal a lot of their biases and perspectives whether they be heavy handed or not. Some of the individuals also don’t realize that he’s trying to point out the hypocrisy in what they are saying versus what they are doing. Many of the people being interviewed in both videos describe hipsters and the type of people they are, yet they look a lot like what they describe. Many of them try to justify it by saying they weren’t in fact hipsters, chav or “fake”, as they so often put it.