rosie the riveter stood as a feminist empowering women figure many years ago, and it seems as though society has packed her up and put her up with the christmas decorations in the attic. In 2016, someone unpacked her and let her take the face of multiple women this year and had brought back women empowerment and expressing sexuality. Beyoncé, one of these empowering women, released one of the best albums of 2016, and it was about loving yourself as well as loving an unfaithful man. So many women are quick to leave a cheating man, and personally I feel like they have every right to. However, Beyoncé took back her cheating husband in the most feminist, female empowering ways ever. In the album, it almost sounds like she took him back, but under her conditions. We all know, Beyoncé does NOT need Jay-Z, but quite frankly, I think he needs her. She acknowledges this and makes half an album about it. Hold Up was expressing how good she was to him, and reminding him that she can move on and still be Beyonce, but will Jay Z be jay without Bey? She also reminds him of how good he’s got it, and he’s got the baddest woman in the game up in his sheets. The song that was the best that completely embraced her femininity, was Sorry. The whole thing is showing how a woman can be strong and unapologetic without a man. Women need to learn this. I’ve seen so many women sit back and take all types of shit from their man because they feel like they won’t be anything without them. Bullshit girl. Go be your own woman. You were born without a man and were raised not being dependent on a man sexually, so what makes you think you need one now? Another woman who I think is the dominant in her relationship is Nicki Minaj with Meek Mill. Her net worth is 80+ million, his is 2+ million. Money isn’t everything, but one this it does represent is powet, and in that relationship if money is power, Minaj sure has the longer stick. These were two, short, very brief examples of women being strong, independent women in 2016, and we need to make this a resolution to carry this over into 2017.
This week I decided to read different comments on twitter revolving around different artists. These comments ranged from positive and regarding certain artists as gods to extremely negative and completely dragging these artists through the mud. I find this all so interesting. When people log on to twitter and an artist has recently released a new project, twitter goes nuts! People talk like crazy, and it makes me think, why? and who are you to say anything? As soon as we click the log on button it seems as though we’re clocking into work and we’re some kind of talent experts. I notice that there are different fan bases, and if the artists doesn’t like an artist, the fan base won’t like that artist either, regardless of the talent that artist may have. For example, the most twitter fan battles are between Nicki Minaj fans and Lil Kim fans, ArianaGrande fans and Mariah Carey fans, and Beyoncé fans and all pop singer fans. These fans will go back and forth to defend their favorite artist, and at some points I ask why? These artists don’t know you personally, nor do they see the arguments all over twitter. To me, it’s a waste of time. Arguing back and forth doesn’t solidify or insolidify an artists artistry. But, yet you waste your time arguing with somebody on twitter that you’ve never met over twitter that most likely you’ll never meet over who is the real queen of rap. What does it prove? Also, it really irks my nerve when an artist drops a new project and people with call it “trash” or “a flop” meaning that it wasn’t successful. There are professional people who are paid to review music and yet, we have teenagers calling it trash or comparing it to the new age bible. Who made you a music expert? On what degree do you have any credentials to say what makes music good music? More importantly, why does it matter? Why can’t we just let artist be great at what they do and make their music and we enjoy it while we have it?
Beyoncé had performed one of her country flavored songs off of Lemonade called “Daddy Lessons.” She performed on the CMA’s which stands for Country Music Awards, she performed the song as a duet with The Dixie Chicks. Although Beyoncé is most famously known as a pop star, she made a guest appearance at the country show. A huge amount of people were highly upset that Beyoncé would be performing at a Country Award show because she’s not country. Many people forget that country music originated from Black people and white people took it and made it popular. So, it baffles that people who were majority white were upset that ,a black pop icon who has been a completely success all by herself performed at their show. Yes, granted she is. more Pop-star, but regardless, her family is from Texas and Alabama. Both of those states are in the south, where many years ago, and still till this day, are a huge country music/rap music region because both of those genres do originate in the south. Rhthym and Blues, Country, and Rock was first created by black slaves on plantations that were created and used to pass time while they were in the fields doing work. So many people categorize artists based on the genres that the mainly perform and can never break outside of those socially constructed barriers without “loosing their roots.” I think it’s hypocritical to box people in to certain stereotypes based on what makes them happy, but if they even resemble some other artist that so happen to be in the same genre, they copying that artist and being “completely unoriginal.” How do you expect someone to be original but shame them and completely disregard their talent as an artist when they try to explore new avenues in their music and share their talents with different people in the world? Regardless of who you are, Beyoncé is here to stay and reign her rightful spot at Queen B.
I am so happy to see women stop using weaves and wigs, and take the ‘journey’ to grow out their natural hair and own who they really are down inside. For many years, in the past and future to come, women will always feel the need to compete and compare themselves to what’s socially acceptable and pretty. It’s draining to see women drag themselves through the mud just so they can be accepted by society. I think these women not buying into weaves, wigs, hair extensions, and hair relaxers are so incredibly strong and are putting their middle finger to social beauty standards. If we want to get rid of beauty standards, we have to stop buying into them. There are a plentiful amount of black women who have gorgeous, long, ethnic hair, and rock the shit out of it, but you don’t see those women on the cover of vogue or Marie Claire. It also infuriates me when white women try and use black women hairstyles and try to make it look cute or as if it’s some new hairstyle. Black women have fought so long to finally be thought of as pretty and still to this day get ridiculed for the type of hair they have,and then white women have the audacity to try and use the same hair black women don’t want? That’s the biggest idea of appropriation I’ve ever seen. Having these women retire the weaves & wigs save animals, because a majority of the weaves come from horse hair or even sheep or lambs wool. They use this hair because it’s soft and long, or soft and curly. They shave these animals or saw off the horses tail in order to have enough hair to make into a weave. It’s harmful towards the animal which they have no say in whatsoever. I can’t applaud these brave women for accepting their natural, black, kinky hair for what it actually is and rocking it. Not only are they accepting their hair, but they’re accepting their blackness, and with the harsh times we’ve seen recently in this country, it’s most important that these black women own who they are and don’t let anybody feel bad about it, because who you are is amazing and no body or hairstyle can change that about you. I hope that this trend of going through the natural journey continues with years to come, because then finally people will start to not feed into the beauty standards and feel confident in their own body.
Many moons ago, surgery wasn’t necessarily frowned upon, but people feared it. They felt as if they could completely avoid surgery they would. However, it seems as if plastic surgery has become a new fad. People are afraid to age and I feel like a lot has to do with because they don’t take care of themselves when they were younger and now they are aging terribly so they resort to getting face lifts, botox, eyebrow lifts. Sometimes people go under the knife and go for plastic surgery for health reasons, for example, my grandma had eyebrow lift done because her skin was sagging and was literally blocking her vision. Sometimes getting plastic surgery done can be for health reasons, but 75% of society get it done for mere beaty enhancements. A huge part of the reason for this high rate in plastic surgery has A LOT to do with beauty standards that we see in society. Models, Actresses, and TV Personalities are photoshopped and caked with make up to perceive this look of flawlessness when it all actuality, its computer generated. We have regular members of society look up to these celebrities and aspire to look like them so they get face lifts, and tummy tucks, and implants to achieve this body that is naturally unachievable, sort of like a Barbie Doll. Then of course what happens to the people who want to achieve this look, but can’t afford it? Their self-esteem plummets to absolutely nothing and feel like they aren’t good enough because these guys only chase these pretty women who 90% of the have something fake about them, whether its hair, nails, body, or clothes, its fake, but that’s the new ‘norm’. Nothing is real anymore and it’s become socially acceptable to have something fake about you. This is typical laziness, instead of working for something, you go and buy it. There is going to come a point where, people are going to be able to pre-determine how their babies are going to look when they are born. It’s dangerous for our well-being as a society.
This weeks reading consisted of butt implants, make up, and the color pink. I think a lot of the opinions around these topics can be so hurtful. We, as a society, love to criticize people based on their decisions as if it effects us in a negative way in any way. Yes, by all means decisions can effect us and the society we live in. However, I see from time to time hate on the internet that Nicki Minaj has a fake booty. A fake booty. This is the redundant commentary that people spew online to think that they’re dragging Nicki down, when, in all actuality, she could probably care less, she’s making her own money, building an empire, and what people care about is whether or not her butt is real. We get so involved in the superficial of these cultural artifacts and find any way to spin it in a negative way that we don’t focus on what’s actually important, what we NEED to be focusing on, bettering ourselves as a society. Highlight and contour have been labeled as a way to give women confidence in how they look. Women feel OBLIGATED to wear make-up because if they don’t, or their cheekbones don’t look abnormal they get made fun of. What kind of society do we live in that women feel they NEED makeup before stepping out of the house? We see so much artificial things shoved in our face such as magazines, models, billboards, clothing ads, or even commercials that have been edited to make someone or something look flawless. This ‘flawless’ look is completely unattainable, but girls don’t know this. Girls think supermodels ACTUALLY look the way they do. This HEAVILY effects a woman’s self-confidence in a negative way. You don’t see an ‘ugly’ girl with extra weight on her modeling forCalvin Klein in New York Fashion week. If designers were smart, they would use REGULAR looking models to campaign their newest looks, because regular people buy these regular clothes. And how disappointing would it be to buy clothes based on how it looks on the model and it doesn’t look anything like what you though? Very fucking disappointing. Pink being a girls color is so tiring. Who made that a fucking law? I want to know. In the midst of a breakthrough of gender roles and stereotypes regarding genders, swing men wearing pink and embracing it as JUST A COLOR (because hello, that’s all it actually is) it cracks a smile on my face. I also LOVE that Nicki Minaj uses pink to dignify her career because she’s not a woman, but is a woman at the same time. She breaks all stereotypes of being a female. I love it.
Reading the information from this weeks reading really opened my eyes about what female sexual empowerment really means. I always thought that it means that women should just be screaming ‘I want sex!’ and that was that. However, what it really means it for both sexes, mainly for women to take a stand and say ‘yes, I have sexual needs, and damnit they need to be filled’. Whereas, for men, they need to respect women as sexual beings, but not just as sexual beings, just as everybody respects men for more than just their penises. Also, a big ideology that I think needs to be put to an end is the dichotomy of men being a stud for sleeping with multiple women, and women being sluts for sleeping with multiple men. Neither is true, and the beliefs that revolves around these ideas I think can be broken if we acknowledge these women celebrities as feminist icon and understand what these artists are saying if we want there something to be done. If we want feminine equality, not only sexual but emotional and mental both in the workplace and out in society, we need to use the resources and make it known, including celebrities, art, music, performances. My last brow-rising thought from these readings are the idea that women are scared. Women can’t own their own sexuality because men take advantage of it and force their sexual needs on the women as if they’re here for men’s sexual pleasure. Some men feel as though when women are sexually open with their wants and needs that they’re asking for it. This is rape culture, and if we’re not fighting for feminism and women being able to freely voice their sexual desires without them being scrutinized, then we’re simply promoting g rape culture. Sex without consent is rape, and rape is technically illegal. However, there are numerous cases where women have accused men of raping them, the man being convicted guilty, and they only receive 3 months in jail. How is that supposed to make that woman feel? She already has to physically and psychologically deal with being raped and having absolutely no fucking justice for this girl! No one stands for women when it goes against the WHITE male. We need to not only enforce feminism in education, but also remember it when it comes to the law. Women are a lot more than just a pair of breast, vagina, and a piece of ass. It’s time to start treating them as more than just a sexual object.
I think that I might have to broaden my topic a slight bit because just focusing on Nicki Minaj as my sole source for feminism and how she is a icon for the feminist movement and how she supports empowering women might cut me short, because the main argument that I’ve noticed against the fact that she might NOT be a feminist is the fact that she had surgery to enhance certain parts of her body and that she in fact is insecure thus making her not a legitimate icon or representative for the feminist movement. This point that argues against Minaj is valuable, but it’s only one and repetitive throughout different sources. I think if I were to add different celebrities l would add Rihanna or Alicia Keys to expand the conversations being had revolving feminism in Hollywood and how some celebrities support the cause. Reading these comments on different articles, it kind of pissed me off that people don’t consider certain celebrities ‘not feminist’ or not supporting the wave because of their body image, or the fact that they’re married, or associate Mrs. with their name. It’s shameful that people don’t actually take the time to listen what these artists have to say. I read a Reddit thread about how Nicki is bad for the feminist because she says ‘fuck them skinny bitches in the club’ and people read those lyrics literally, but it means a lot more than what it actually means. For the first time listening Anaconda sounds like a booty-shaking club banger, but these artists are a lot smarter and have a lot more to offer to us listeners, and maybe possibly even fans, than what meets the eye, or in this case ear.
While looking up information on my topic, I was watching good morning America. Barack Obama and Michelle Obama we’re being interviewed about a new museum that opened up highlighting black history. Interesting enough the same interview that he was giving of the museum had a Display showcasing hair picks with a fist at the top. This symbol shows that there is power in our hair power in loving ourselves. I thought great there’s my photo. I began to Google when they showed another picture that absorbed my attention.
They showed a picture of a little boy touching the president of the United States hair. Barack Obama spoke about the experience. The little boy was taking a picture with the president and his family. When the picture was over he asked the president A question he had been pondering. he wanted to know if Obamas hair felt just like his. The president smiled and said well why don’t you touch it and find out. That is when this picture was taking as the boy was touching Obama’s hair to see how it compared to his.
So often when researching about natural hair my biggest motivation is inspiring young girls to love The way that they were born. I failed to see that boys too are looking at us, the adults to model their own lives. The hair on the presidents head did not represent hair follicles but possibility. The possibility that a boy with hair like his could grow up to become someone important. This picture has helped put into context why The natural hair movement is such an important one. The little boy was looking for a connection. He was trying to see if Obama was really like him. If someone who had something that we tend to find insignificant like hair just like his could become the president of the United States. It is fascinating to me how observant children are. Most people don’t consider how things like hair can effect Young minds. This picture is now hanging in the White House.
The Blue Marble is one of those rare photographs that have been seen by millions, possibly billions of eyes around the globe. Taken by Apollo 17 in 1972, the photograph, in the exact same way in which the moon landing was received, symbolizes so much more than what the American Apollo program was doing up in space, and crosses boundaries of race and ethnicity, gender and nationality. The picture is universal. Advertisements are designed specifically for the consumer and consumerism’s sake. Political or social movement posters target a specific demographic and ask, demand or try to persuade audiences to adopt similar perspectives. Even the world’s great art hold’s a cultural resemblance to the society in which its creator was born. Not so for the Blue Marble. And the image’s universality is represented in its simplicity. We have all seen a globe or an atlas of the world. In that sense, we have all seen an image of the world from a perspective very similar to the one the Blue Marble gives us. But this time something is very, very different. Finally, we see the world how it actually is, rather than a geopolitical chaos of borders and boundaries. And for a moment we understand that it truly is possible, at least in this one context but the hope is in more, to take our political, social and cultural differences and throw them out the window, realizing that we all live on one tiny little marble in space. From this distance we are all equally vulnerable.
I also believe the picture says something very fundamental about the persons behind the camera. By the point in history when this photo would have been circulated, the Apollo 11 mission would have been well known and the somewhat conflicting words and actions of the first men who walked on the moon. “That’s one small step for a man, one giant leap for mankind” said Armstrong, and there was almost no doubt that he was certainly right, yet they proceeded to steal the spotlight for the United States’ sake by planting one of their own national flag on the lunar surface. Were the Apollo missions going to be primarily a human endeavor, or an American expedition? By the final trip to our moon, Apollo 17, it was becoming more clear that yes, the whole world could and should take pride in the huge stride technology and science had made in the last century and that the oneness of the world and the human race was not contained simply in the fact that national boundaries are imaginary and that we inhabited a single world, but now finally were are given a sense that we have a unity of purpose as well, one toward curiosity and exploration of our universe.