Oct 012016
 

Companies and markets create images of their brands that they project on to the identity of their consumers. This is true for almost all brands. Apple has an image of trendy innovative youth residing in silicon valley. Jeep has an image of patriotic pro-gun Americans. Every brand has an image and they project it on to its consumers creating this distinct ‘myth’ about who we are as consumers. An article in the Journal of Consumer Research states that many theorists believe that markets and companies create trends and project them on to subgroups of individuals. And people who identify with certain values seek out these brands to reaffirm their identities. However, the study finds that with the case of hipsters, we have an entirely different thing going on. Hipsters actually go against such preconceptions and they arent the only ones. “Rather than being an iconic resource for identity construction (Holt 2004), the consumers in our study experience a marketplace myth as a threat to the value of their identity investments in a field of consumption”  (JCR) They believe that sometimes certain groups see these images that brands project onto consumers and they find that some groups like to seperate themselves from the standard myth of their group. “They use demythologizing practices to protect these investments from devaluation and to distance and distinguish their field of consumption, and corresponding consumer identities, from these undesirable associations.” This is performed by being rebellious to what the market place projects your group as representing. These groups then radiate a rebellious aura with incorporated ritualistic practices that they use to distance themselves from their group myth. However this tends to backfire because companies will use your new achieved independence against you. “Hard-core members of the Harley-Davidson brand community engage in a number of ritualistic practices to distinguish themselves from the various cultural clichés that have been sparked by the brand’s burgeoning mainstream popularity.” Companies use this independent rebellious nature to then create a mainstream myth about the Harley Davidson brand. The Harley Davidson group is now known for being tough, independent bikers who hang around sketchy bars and they live outside the law. Harley Davidson used their consumers own rebellious nature against them to create a new brand image. Companies do this all the time an we don’t even recognize it. “Hummer owners confront the moralistic backlash directed at their vehicles by portraying themselves as heroic defenders of the American exceptionalist ideals and values represented by this iconic brand.” They take subgroups and their ideas and morals and use it for their brands. They project a certain image with it, making it mainstream. Once its mainstream, these subgroups have to deal with the fact that their ideas and brands are now mainstream. They have to see their brands and ideas being taken up by the everyday person and from then on it isn’t the group who controls the image, but the companies. This idea could explain why some hipsters hate being called hipsters and why others take it up as a badge of honor. The hipster myth and image was taken up for commercial use, essentially stealing it from the real hipsters. They created an image of indie-rock, organic food and expensive coffee and they made it mainstream.

Sep 252016
 

I think that the natural hair movement in the 70’s represented black power, and not assimilating into western ideals of beauty it was a political stand. The movement is gaining power in 2016 however I think the representation has shifted. Natural hair is now a symbol of self acceptance, self love and cultural connections. I chose to no longer receive chemical straightening treatments and damage my hair with heat because I am choosing to accept myself and change my own ideas of what beauty is.

The natural hair movement community is divided. Some people believe that only girls with coily hair can become a part of this movement. They even want to exclude biracial women and light skinned women from this movement. I think that anyone who decides to embrace their hair can be part of this movement. Black, white, Spanish, dark skinned, light skinned , it doesn’t really matter. If you are choosing to love your outer self and accept your hair for how it is, damage free then join this movement and claim it. My argument for this is that natural hair stands for something different then it did in the 70’s.

This is a personal choice to go natural with your hair. The key word is choice, you can choose to go natural or you can choose to continue to alter your hairs texture. Some women in the natural hair community online like to bash non naturals for not embracing their curls and coils. Going natural costs a lot more and takes more time then getting a new perm every few weeks. I am aware that this is not a priority to some people and if its not and you are happy with chemically straightened hair that’s fine too. There is no need to bash each other. We need to eliminate the terms “good hair” and “bad hair” from our conversations. Although I still want to know who Becky is and what constitutes her having “good hair.” I dislike this distinguishing modifier used  to identify a person. It adds to the illusion that there is one right hair type.

 

Not so Innocent

 Posted by on Sun, 9/25 at 11:45pm  ideas  No Responses »
Sep 252016
 

princess_jasmine_disneyjasmine2-pngc200

 

I went to Disney this weekend and had a thought after seeing the parade. Little girls look up to these princesses from Disney movies, but have no idea that they have an impact on their hypersexualization starting at a young age. For example, when watching or really looking into some Disney movies, it’s quite fascinating that such innocent movies really do have an effect on how girls are living/acting in this generation. For example, when we look at Snow White she is a princess who is the prettiest in the whole land. That is what she is valued for and what saves her in the end by the prince. Looks are everything. Girls learn that guys like pretty girls, not nobodys. When we look at Cinderella, that same can be applied. Cinderella goes to the ball and dances with the prince. Not one word is uttered, they just dance. Looks are everything. He searches the whole land when she loses her glass slipper on the stairs. He is searching for the pretty girl at the ball. It also suggests that the prince likes blondes and not brunettes.  The Disney princess, Ariel wants to win the love of Prince Eric, but she is mermaid. The witch, Ursula casts a spell on her and grants her to be human for 3 days. Ariel loses her voice. When she asks, how she will communicate with the Prince, Ursula says, “You’ll have your looks, your pretty face”. She says for Ariel to understand the importance of body language. This is interesting because everyone knows that this is another way to say flirt with him. By flirting you are touching his arm or leg, leaning towards a guy, smiling, laughing at jokes(even if they are lame), etc…This is teaching little girls how to get a guy. It’s a bit early to teach young girls how to snag a guy and it is a bit misleading that these movies are teaching girls to just rely on their looks. Personality obviously doesn’t matter, ha. It is very superficial and promotes sexualization of girls to believe that the only way they can achieve pretty is by makeup. Jasmin is one of the most sexualized princesses. Her eyes are larger than proportionally accurate, her lips are big and her nose is tiny. Her top falls down her shoulders and her stomach is exposed. In the movie, Aladdin, we see Jafar trying to snag princess Jasmin. He is after her looks and has a very aggressive behavior in trying to get her. She plays with Jafar’s head when she sees Aladdin hiding behind a chair in the room. He is there to save her. She talks in a low, seductive voice to Jafar to distract him and says, “Jafar, I never really noticed how handsome you really are” and kisses him. This scene is a bit sleazy. Jasmine uses her body and sexuality, to seduce Jafar. This too is a dangerous message to send to young girls because it tells them that they can use their bodies to get what they want. It is showing girls it’s okay to manipulate.

Disney movies are not as innocent as you think they are. Look a little closer and you will see the impact these Disney movies have on little kids.

Sep 252016
 

I think that I might have to broaden my topic a slight bit because just focusing on Nicki Minaj as my sole source for feminism and how she is a icon for the feminist movement and how she supports empowering women might cut me short, because the main argument that I’ve noticed against the fact that she might NOT be a feminist is the fact that she had surgery to enhance certain parts of her body and that she in fact is insecure thus making her not a legitimate icon or representative for the feminist movement.  This point that argues against Minaj is valuable, but it’s only one and repetitive throughout different sources.  I think if I were to add different celebrities l would add Rihanna or Alicia Keys to expand the conversations being had revolving feminism in Hollywood and how some celebrities support the cause.  Reading these comments on different articles, it kind of pissed me off that people don’t consider certain celebrities ‘not feminist’ or not supporting the wave because of their body image, or the fact that they’re married, or associate Mrs. with their name.  It’s shameful that people don’t actually take the time to listen what these artists have to say. I read a Reddit thread about how Nicki is bad for the feminist because she says ‘fuck them skinny bitches in the club’ and people read those lyrics literally, but it means a lot more than what it actually means.  For the first time listening Anaconda sounds like a booty-shaking club banger, but these artists are a lot smarter and have a lot more to offer to us listeners, and maybe possibly even fans, than what meets the eye, or in this case ear.

Sep 252016
 

Religion is one of those topics (right along with politics) that we’re told not to talk about at the dinner table. It always leads to one party scoffing at the other’s opinion and both are left feeling offended. I was personally raised Jewish. Even though I wasn’t conservative by any means, I still went to temple occasionally and believed in all of what the religion had to offer. As I started to get older and learn more about science, some of the teachings from the Torah (First Testament) started to lose their credibility. This sparked the beginning of my agnostic phase. Since then, I began to wonder why other fields of knowledge advance and develop while religion (something that is so engrained in society) is stagnant. When there are break-throughs in science, religion doesn’t change.

Even though my faith in religion started to dwindle, I still believed (and still do to this day) that the underlying messages and “rules” were good and I really liked the traditions as they gave me an excuse to stuff my face with my family about 5 times per year. I truly believe that religion is as good or evil as the people participating make it. People who are inherently evil will find the evil in whatever they worship and vice versa.

With the recent global events involving radical religious groups, I’ve started to wonder if religion is helping or hurting society as a whole. Religion often conveys a rather confusing message; Do to others what you would want them to do to you…. unless they have different beliefs. I believe that religion, while there are undeniably positive characteristics, is just perpetuating intolerance. In the United States, people are being discriminated against because their beliefs don’t fit in with “Christian values.” All over the world, people are being killed by Isis (a radical religious group based off of Islam) in the name of Muhammad because they have a different set of ideas and values. I’m wondering if what was initially made to bring us together could now be a major force in dividing us.

 

11 years is a long time

 Posted by on Sun, 9/25 at 9:55pm  ideas  No Responses »
Sep 252016
 

Is it even that important to know and understand every detail of plot in a video game? Like, I get that the game is so loved and whatever bc of the original idea… meshing Disney with FF to create something new. And, yeah, the original game was about a boy trying to find and save his friends, but… that idea has to go somewhere to advance the series. The same people trashing the series for being so overly complicated and lore-y would be crying about the unoriginality of the game if it continued with the same basic plot and end goal. I agree that the game has gotten overcomplicated, but I feel like that’s what makes it… interesting? enjoyable?

I wouldn’t be screaming every time KHIII gets delayed if it was just the same story told a third time. Yeah it’s overcomplicated but it’s just a game!!! Logic doesn’t have to apply. Especially if the character you play as can fly, use magic, and fights the bad guys with a giant fancy looking key… if you really want to start applying logic to a game about magic?…

The exclusive to certain consoles thing Square does has always annoyed me though. I had to borrow my friend’s PSP in high school to play one of the spinoff games.. I basically bought a 3DS just to play another one of the spinoff games… and I decided to get a PS4 over an xbox only because I figured KHIII would be released on it. It’s actually set to drop on both consoles now though.. but, anyway. So now that there’s this rumor of it being released on some whole OTHER platform.. it’s not confirmed but it kinda pisses me off and I would guess it would piss off all those fans who think the game’s downfall is its multiple platform exclusivity too.

That being said I think the whole over analyzation fans do regarding the plot misses the point of playing games. It’s fun to pick apart plot points and have theories and end games with questions and look forward to answers and that’d be kinda obsolete if the series was left at the simple. Could certain aspects be done better, sure. But most people whining about it don’t have the means to be a video game writer or director or designer and they don’t offer anything in replacement of what they complain about.

Is an extended period of time in between games really a valid reason to lose interest? I hadn’t played a KH game since high school but I bought the 3DS as soon as I could afford it last year just to play the most recent game. Even then I put it down for a few months in constant losing frustration and I still went back to it and ended up binge playing and finishing it within about a week or so. 11 years is a lot, but I feel like there’s enough nostalgia to spark up a glimmer of interest at least.

Mad world

 Posted by on Sun, 9/25 at 9:51pm  ideas  No Responses »
Sep 252016
 

this day there is so much scandal and really horrible betrayal against human nature. And it all started with money. Now people think that money can help them and bring them happiness and it is not true because it only brings you stuff. Yes, i said it money only bring people stuff. Stuff like food, water bill, electrical bill, medical bill which all at the end of the day gave us a headache or stroke. Now as i was making research for my topic, i stumble in to words like bankruptcy, a world without money…  And as we all know our economy is not perfect because we do not know what to do with money. what i am trying to say is that there are lot of money grants out there and i t is hard to get qualify if you are someone who drop out of High School.  amd it is hard to even get a decent job without having a bachelor degree or master one. Our economy has pulverized us and made us think that we are living the dream when in fact we work to make money and we broke after two days from getting paid because we spend it on bills, mortgage, food, technology. it is mess up and literally not a great way to live since stress is not good for our body. Our wolrd is much better without the economy system because it would eliminate threats such as scammers, identity thefts, doing illegal stuff to get money fast or known as money under the table.

Sep 252016
 

I know a lot about Superman. I could tell you the Kryptonian date that he was born, read and write in his native language, recite his social security number, and even speak a few phrases in Kryptonese. But as much as I love the character, I tend to stay away from reading certain things about him. He’s my hero, and, despite how stupid this sounds, he’s been there for me when I’ve needed him the most. Why would I want to read articles in which the author either doesn’t understand or downright despises the character? With this class, I am given little option, and I think it might be for the best. I already know what the fanbase is saying about the character. I could tell you exactly how the dedicated fans are feeling about having the Post-Crisis Superman take over for the recently deceased New 52 Superman, or how the release of March 2016’s Batman v Superman: Dawn of Justice has split the fanbase even greater than 2013’s Man of Steel. I’m knowledgable about what is being said within the community, but I am vaguely familiar with what is being said by detractors (aside from the lousy excuses for reasons to dislike the character) and those who have a general understanding of the character. As I’ve written elsewhere, Superman is engrained in our culture. People much smarter than I have commented that The Man of Steel and his colleagues are essentially modern day American mythology. A lot is being said about Superman. People have written essays on the scientific workings of his abilities, how he’s impacted American society, the moral and philosophical questions he’s raised, and even the practicality of him and Lois engaging in coitus. While I doubt that I will be able to bring anything new to the conversation, especially since the character is nearly 80 years old, I do hope to be able to sort through the myriad articles and essays to perhaps consolidate what is being said into an easy-to-comprehend piece of literature. The character means a lot to me and plays a huge role in my life. I am in contact with people who love the character and despise his very existence. However, after reading the articles from this week, I feel that I am well-equipped to be writing about this topic. I write for The Superman Homepage and host a podcast on the character; I think I have a pretty good understanding of who the character is, why he works, and what makes him so enduring.

(Ideas) Why Do People Care?

 Posted by on Sun, 9/25 at 8:58pm  ideas  No Responses »
Sep 252016
 

Okay, but seriously. Why do people care about how much or how little makeup you wear? This has a lot to do with my topic, “makeup”, but this issue just seems to always spark my thoughts to runneth over. I feel like you can’t win. If you don’t wear makeup you look like a person who is dying and if you do wear makeup you are “fake”. You just can’t win over some people. Not to mention, “are you the one that is applying my makeup or buying my makeup or having to wear my makeup?” Then STFU! I believe that you should do you. If you want to cake makeup onto your face to where you can scrape your finger through it at the end of the day, so be it. But if you also want to let your face be free and naked with nothing then you should do that too. Makeup doesn’t define who I am but it sure as hell makes me look a lot more alive. I also take into consideration the fact that someone like me who loves makeup is artsy. I grew up loving colors, drawing, pictures, and fashion. It’s in my blood to stand out and be unique. I love the different types of makeup and the different ways to apply it. I also love the different looks that makeup can make. The only problem is that once you start wearing makeup on an every day basis, that’s when not wearing makeup can be tough. I have tried this before and it sucks. I wear makeup all the time and then one day I decide not to wear any and people are passing “Get Well” cards over my way.  The only thing that scares me is I don’t want my daughter to think that wearing makeup or not wearing makeup is good or bad, which is what society is making this out to be. I just hope that she will do whatever makes her happy as a woman. Whether she wears makeup or not, I just hope that she does it for the right reasons and not what society thinks she should do as a person. Again, as stated above, you cannot win. All you can do is do what you want to do and make yourself happy.

Sep 252016
 

Social media is a way for brands to directly contact their customers. Brands were able to do this before by sending out mail ads, which they still do, but it’s now overwhelmingly via email. This saves them major coins because they don’t have to pay for paper and mailing costs, and it’s a lot better for the environment. Although, working at a cosmetics counter, I really hate when people pull out their phones and they’re like, “but I got an email saying…”. And then 10 times out of 1o it’s for an offer that is online only and they want it in stores. Well look, Susie Q, I can’t do an damn thing about it; you’ll have to order online. For me, this is one of the disadvantages of brands using online marketing to generate business. If you’re going to offer promotions online that aren’t honored in stores, you’re driving your business to your website. That’s fine for the brand because they’re making their profit one way or another, but it hurts the people that they’ve employed to work their counters. I work off of commission so I need to sell as much as a possible can to make ends meet, but not only that, brand executives put a lot of pressure on beauty advisors (people working the counter) to make as many and as high sales as we can. Which we would love to, because we benefit from it as well, but when brands push customers online, there’s no way for us to make our sales. The most common thing that I see is free “gifts” offered for online orders. They’re not really gifts, they’re just samples but people go crazy for them because they think they’re getting something. So, people would rather order online than come into the store to buy their products. But what people don’t realize is that in stores, we sell our service. That’s what we’re trained to do; we sell services before we sell products. You’re looking for a foundation? I’m going to give you luxury service because I work for a luxury brand. You’ll get basically a mini facial and makeover just because you came in for a foundation. And it doesn’t matter if you don’t buy the other products that I used, I’m just showing you what else you could use in conjunction with the foundation. But, most importantly, you get to see and feel the texture of the foundation. I seriously don’t understand how people buy foundation online. You have to try it on to see what colour you should wear and to see if you even like the formula. But going back to services: people don’t realize that that’s what they’re buying when they purchase luxury brand cosmetics. Services aren’t offered online which is why most brands offer free samples (which you can get at any cosmetic counter anyway) but people think they’re getting a great deal. Brands just need to realize that they’re not making any more than the would because they’re taking sales from their counters and moving them online. This only causes frustration from BAs and ends up costing them more than the profit they think it generates.