Cassandra

Nov 202016
 

Before revising essay 1, my paper’s main idea was all over the place. I wanted to talk about beauty standards, the idea of beauty, and the lack/misrepresentation of beauty all in one paper! I think I was having such a hard time organizing my paper and developing one certain conversation/topic because I wasn’t really sure what I wanted to write about. Before starting to revise my essay 1, I really thought about what direction I wanted my paper to go in and told myself to only pick one route. I decided to go with the misrepresentation of beauty in the fashion industry because its something that really interest me as well as affects me. 

I want to continue with this idea for my essay 3 but instead of the misrepresentation of beauty I want to write about the lack of diversity in the fashion industry. When I say lack of diversity I’m leaning more towards body size and race. I want to write about how the lack of diversity in fashion effects our society and culture. Ive been brainstorming different conversations/issues to implement into my paper this is what I have thought about so far:

  1. for body size I was thinking how the lack of diversity in the fashion industry affects how we see ourselves as well as how we see others with different bodies then our own. Does this cause  a type of social boundary between thin people and heavier people? Bullying? Social expectations as to what you should wear if your thin/heavy?
  2. Race and cultural appropriation. Designers hire mostly white models even if designs are inspired by different race/culture. Why not hire different ethnic models (in which their race has inspired different trends/designs)? Why is it that when white models/celebrities where fashion trends/designs inspired by different cultures it is seen as stylish/beautiful? Ex: Kylie Jenner and cornrows. How does race in fashion affect the types of clothes people from different races wear (economic standard)? Is their racism in the fashion industry?

Theses are just my thoughts out loud. Having struggled with essay 1, I really want to have a clear direction and say something!

 

 

Nov 172016
 

 Each year according to the Joint Economic Committee, (composed by the United States congress) the fashion industry has a yearly revenue of $1.2 trillion dollars globally and a $250 billion dollar yearly revenue here in the United States. The Fashion industry is a thriving industry, one that has a great impact on our society and culture because society wears fashion and culture creates fashion. Our society is made up of people who have different body sizes, different heights and are of a different race. However the fashion industry is very one dimensional industry. This comes from the fact that the industry uses models who are mainly skinny, tall and white. While there isn’t a problem with someone having those characteristics there is a problem with the fashion industry misrepresenting all people in society and worse misrepresenting different cultures.

With a lack of body diversity many have accused the fashion industry as being a gateway for women and eating disorders as well as body dysmorphia . The lack of racial diversity in the fashion industry has lead to the conversation of racism and cultural appropriation in the industry. As a member of society and an avid contributor to the fashion industry it is important to explore the idea about the fashion industry lacking body and racial diversity as well as how it is affecting our society and culture. 

Are you a villain?

 Posted by on Sat, 11/5 at 2:01pm  ideas  No Responses »
Nov 052016
 

This week I did a little more research (in order to have little more insight for our cultural artifact assignment) on the photo editing software named Photoshop. I came across an article that was written by a professional photographer it was titled “Is photoshop a villain?” Essentially the article was about Photoshop and the perception society has on it in our culture. After reading this article I had major thoughts and ideas. For one can artifacts actually be good or bad or does our culture/society give them the label they want to give them. Do we label artifacts good or bad depending on how they will benefit us in the long run? Do we label artifacts good or bad because they are not necessarily something that we believe in or are very fond of?

Take the example of this cultural artifact: Make-up. I am a wearer of make-up. I LOVE make-up. Do I wear it all the time? NO. Do I feel ugly without it? NO. Do I think I’m hideous and thats why I wear it? NO. Do I feel prettier with it? YES. Does it change the person that I am or what I will stand up for? NO. Do I get judged for wearing make-up? YES. I wear make up because I want to look my best. (Is there something wrong with that?) I like make- up because to me its like art. There are so many colors/shades you can choose from in relation to eyeshadows, lipsticks,eyeliners,mascara, blushes, bronzers etc. There are so many looks that one can do with make up. The greatest thing about make up is that you can choose the amount you want to wear. Sometimes I can wear very little, a little bit more or even none. It all depends on the occasion. I have been told that people who wear make up are fake or have something to hide. They consider make-up a villain in our society. They say that make-up skews reality.I don’t think this is true. When I wear make-up I don’t think I look like a completely different person. It’s not like I went to go get tons of cosmetic procedures to alter my face (and if someone actually does this who cares?)  Yet people think that wearers of make-up are fake. They say that make-up is deceiving that people are trying to portray something that they are not. I apologize if you thought that I was born with eyeliner on my eyelids and highlight on my cheeks. I’ve been called out by certain feminist that I know because I wear make-up. I thought being a feminist (correct me if I’m wrong) was suppose to be about women empowerment or is the term feminist reserved for only certain “types” of women. One more thing I cannot stand is when people assume that just because you wear make-up you can’t be intelligent. I’ve heard people say that I should focus my time on other things. I go to school full time (get excellent grades), I work part time, I do my homework, I sleep, I eat, and do other things. The time it takes for me to do my make-up does not take away the time for all of these other things. I choose to spend the time to do my make-up (if I have to wake up earlier then that is my decision that shouldn’t effect anyone else). I understand that other people will have a different priority list when it comes to dividing their time but why judge people who have different priorities/lifestyles. Maybe this has to do with age? Different priorities different age? I don’t know. What I do know is that make-up isn’t the villain here. Maybe you are. I think this is true to all cultural artifacts. I we like them they are heroes and if we don’t we consider them villains.

Nov 022016
 
  1. My Chosen Artifact is…

The photo editing software known as Photoshop.

2. How do you classify your artifact? In what groups can you place your artifact? What connections can you make to other artifacts in the group?

I would classify my artifact as part of technology, media, photography, marketing, business and the beauty/fashion industry

Connections:

1. Other Photographic apps like Snapchat and Instagram (you can edit in these     apps)

2. Make-up (covers imperfections)

3.Spanx (molds body into different size)

4.Filters (enhance photographs, not real)

3. Identify points of similarity between your artifact and others. Then identify points of difference with other artifacts. How is it similar? How is it different?

1. Other photographic apps like Instagram and Snapchat. Both of these apps are used to take photographs and save them on a profile. When a          picture is taken the user has the option to edit the photograph to enhance its features like photoshop does. Instagram does not only allow you to     add filters to the photograph but you can switch up/down the brightness, contrast, sharpness, fade, highlights, shadows, tilt shift. It is not as     complex as Photoshop but you can do a lot of editing unlike Snapchat. Instagram is free unlike Photoshop which makes its community much     bigger.

2. Make-up. Make up is also used by people to mask certain imperfections that they might have or may not be happy with. People argue that using     make-up is like wearing everyday photoshop. Most of the time you can  tell when someone is wearing make-up. Photoshop editors have become     so good at there job that most of the time we cant tell if a photograph has been manipulated. With both make-up and Photoshop the user can     chose to apply very minimal or pack it on.

3. Spanx. People wear Spanx to help mold their body. In the fashion industry Photoshop is used to mold the models body into certain sizes. There have been mishaps while altering a models body through Photoshop. Sometimes an arm is longer or knees have been cutoff and the body proportions are way off.

4. Filters. People use filters everyday when taking selfies or other types of photographs. These filters are used to enhance the photograph by     changing the color and even face proportion. Snapchat has a filter that when applied makes your eyes bigger and your face slimmer. It is not an     easy filter to distinguish between real and unreal  just like photoshop.

4. What metaphors or analogies suit your artifact? (Explain if needed)

The most common one is that Photoshop is art. People can create the most imaginative and crazy photographies using Photoshop.

Photoshop is a form of plastic surgery.

5. How is your artifact characterized? (How do people/media/groups characterize it?)

Photoshop can be used by anyone who knows how to manipulate a computer. Most people characterize Photoshop as a villain distorting our perception of reality. Other can characterize it as an enhancement software. Photoshop helps us enhance something perfect but it can make it even better.

6. What cultural narratives govern your artifact?

That all photographs that have been manipulate by Photoshop are not real or contain a real perception of reality. This not always true Photoshop is not only used to alter body size or create flawless skin it can be used to enhance lighting. Before photoshop photographers use to have to waste a lot of energy to create an atmosphere filled with light and before that they use to have to let mother nature create it.

7. What assumptions, stereotypes, habits, social practices, and institutions frame your artifact?

Photoshop is widely known to be used in the beauty industry and media. It is stereotyped as creating a distorting reality of what is normal in beauty and body size.  We are living in a time where Photoshop is being used in excessive amounts.

8. What doctrines or practices affect your artifact? (Or, what doctrines or practices you’re your artifact affect?) Political parties and platforms? Religious? Ideological? Which ones? Are there cultural “rules” and practices? Which?

Photographs are everywhere and are a part of everything. In politics people can manipulate their ad campaigns to only show a positive aspect leaving out the negative one. This idea is true for both religious and ideology. Any little manipulation can change the entire meaning of a photograph.

9. How does your artifact affect culture? How does culture affect your artifact?

Photoshop has affected my personal culture because I have not lived in a world without Photoshop. Photoshop was invented 25 years ago and I am 22. Is it possible that in my culture there is no virgin photograph. One without any manipulation or alteration. Today photographs have a big impact on how people view themselves and the world. Are people disappointed when they travel to Paris and realize they prefer the Paris they saw in the brochure. When people go to a restaurant are they disappointed when their food does not display the same delicious goodness they saw in the menu. Our culture also affects Photoshop because we are obsessed with being flawless. The number of cosmetic procedures is at in all time high. The beauty industry makes billions of dollars every year. Photoshop only exist because people keep using it so what does that say about our culture.

Oct 302016
 

One of my culture artifacts is the picture editing program called Photoshop that is why this week I decided to read  and learn more about it. I had always heard about Photoshop and how certain media outlets use it to distort the perception of beauty. According to the article”How 25 years of photoshop changed our perception of reality,” Photoshop was launched twenty-five years ago by Thomas Knoll (this really amazes me because I am twenty-two years old which means I have not lived a life without Photoshop). It started as a simple computer program that was only able to display a black and white images on a computer screen. For the last twenty five years Adobe Photoshop has slowly but surely taken over our computers, smartphones, social media, fashion magazines, and newspapers.

The article goes on to say that our society is so use to seeing photographs that have been altered by photoshop that we become shocked when we see real photographs without photoshop. Photographs that have been altered can lead people to believe that what they are seeing is “normal.” Photoshop does not only effect the perception of beauty it also effects the perception we have about everyday events. Apparently over editing is not only limited to the fashion industry anymore Photoshop is now being overused in photojournalism. Renowned German media scholar Thomas Kniepe states in the article that there are no clear regulations to using Photoshop however we as a society need to rethink how much of this software we use. Kniepe says, “Generally, technical edits like adjusting colors, sharpening, and removing fluff are tolerated by most media organizations.But what’s usually considered a no-go is changing the meaning of a picture by creating a montage, removing objects and people as well as adding in new information.” It is important that the media does not abuse photoshop because one little manipulation can change the entire meaning of a photograph.

In related to beauty standards using photoshop to alter or modify photographs can have a disastrous outcome in the minds of young girls and women. In a blog post by “Beauty Redefined” it says that “While the vast majority of images of women are being digitally altered, so are our perceptions of normal, healthy, beautiful and attainable.” From the year 1999 to 2006, there was a 119% increase in the number of children under age 12 hospitalized due to an eating disorder (most of which were girls). According to the blog “the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services reports that no exact cause of eating disorders have yet been found, they do admit that some characteristics have been shown to influence the development of the illnesses, which include low self-esteem, fear of becoming fat and being in an environment where weight and thinness were emphasized – all of which are shown to be related to media depictions of idealized bodies.” Most if not all of these idealized bodies will have been altered with photoshop many times before they are released.

Many if not all millennials do not know life without Photoshop. As I am learning more about this editing software I am coming to terms with the fact that almost every photograph that I have seen and will see will have a slight (or more) of manipulation. As it relates to beauty standards Photoshopping has taken altering to a new level that without any regulations will lead to much harm among our society.

http://www.beautyredefined.net/photoshopping-altering-images-and-our-minds/

http://www.dw.com/en/how-25-years-of-photoshop-changed-our-perception-of-reality/a-18284410

 

Never Enough

 Posted by on Sun, 10/30 at 8:35pm  ideas  No Responses »
Oct 302016
 

         As I was scrolling through the social media app Instagram, I came across a photo of a young girl (probably 5-7 years old). The photograph illustrated the young girl with scissors pointing to her belly and a photograph of a model laying in her lap. There was also a caption that said “Girls aren’t born hating their bodies- we teach them to.” I had seen pictures similar to this before but today when I saw this picture many different thoughts came to my head. Perhaps this is because I have spent more time reading about beauty and body standards. I think that what the picture is portraying is the reality we are living in today but I also think it goes a little beyond that. Its true that most “beautiful people” portrayed in the media look a certain way but I think that in todays society everyone is also being taught that there is no such thing as perfection. With that lesson we are leaving out a crucial piece of information. Perfection is unattainable because the perception of everything lies in the mindset of an individual. However no one really tells you that its okay not to be perfect or that you shouldn’t compare yourself with someone else. Most importantly the way you look does not determine what you can and cannot do. Does it really? My question is, if we are actually trying to teach our youth to be accepting and content with they way they look then why are still trying to live up to beauty standards (because we are)?  I think part of our aesthetic  standards comes from our culture. I feel like we always want more (concerning with everything) and nothing is ever enough! Where does the beauty spectrum begin and end? You can’t be to skinny or to fat! You shouldn’t wear to much make up but you shouldn’t be completely bare! You should show a little skin but not to much! You should have flaws but only certain kinds of flaws. I think that we always try to blame the media for setting up what we call beauty standards but I think our culture has a bigger impact on the connotation of beauty.

OMG! Did you see what she was wearing?

 Posted by on Sun, 10/23 at 8:43pm  ideas  No Responses »
Oct 232016
 

People complain that the media promotes unrealistic beauty standards but what I’m realizing now (due to research for my topic) is that so do we. This week I was on Instagram and I came across a post (that was posted by a female) which said that “big” girls should not wear choker necklaces because they won’t look good on them. WHAT!? WHY?! Im not sure about everyone else but I can’t stand it when people create boundaries for someone based on their appearance. We on our own create beauty standards everyday. On Instagram there are pages dedicated to people with thigh gaps or people covered in tattoos  and each page has communities of people commenting on how this particular aspect is beautiful. Then you have other people posting negative comments that say that those different aspects are not beautiful. So who is correct? I have heard that beauty is in the eye of the beholder but what does that really mean when it comes to beauty standards. To me beautiful (when it comes to a person) is when someone just owns who they are but for someone else that word beautiful can relate to something totally different. I guess i don’t have a problem with a person having a different perception of beauty then I do but rather the discrimination against people who don’t meet their beauty standards (or any standard for that matter). For example on the topic of make up and beauty. There are some that believe that wearing make up is being fake . Then you have those people that love make up and consider it art. Within these two different thoughts there is a created beauty standard. The problem arises when either side speaks negatively about the other. Who is correct? Who will really care at the end of the day? Thinking about this makes me wonder about my paper and the stakeholders section. The way I see it is that we are all stakeholders but have different stakes when it comes to this topic but how do I conceptualize this.

Artifact Ideas!

 Posted by on Sun, 10/23 at 7:24pm  artifact ideas  3 Responses »
Oct 232016
 

Weight Scale: A weight scale is a common household item that most people (mainly women) have in their homes. Beauty standards today have created a sort of obsession with these scales because there is a correlation in society with beauty and weight. Weight scales are mostly associated  with women thus portraying the thin is beautiful beauty standard. Every year in January we are bombarded with new year resolution commercials from brands like Special K and weight watchers. Both of these brands (as well as others) contain weight scales in their ads and ultimately say that a lesser number on the scale will make you a better version of yourself. 

 

Mirror: To some a mirror is just a regular item that people use to see reflections. Except in todays society a mirror is being used to see our imperfections. People use it to nit pick every part of their body and face that society says is not pretty like cellulite, stretch marks,scars, pores, wrinkles, dark circles, small breast, curves, etc. People let mirrors define their self worth and beauty.

 

Photoshop: We have all seen those photoshop fails, the ones where the model has an awkwardly long arm or is missing her knee. Or what about the ones where the model has no pores (everyone has pores!) and their thigh gap (this could also be an artifact! young girls have become obsessed with thigh gaps) is awkwardly far apart. The media has been using photoshop to portray unrealistic beauty standards in society which has caused many people to aim for untenable beauty.

 

 

Ideas or a rant? IDK?

 Posted by on Sat, 10/15 at 1:43pm  ideas  No Responses »
Oct 152016
 

I have family member who take part of beauty competions and own beauty pageants. When ever I have time I help out but I can’t help but feel utterly confused and guilty. Part of me is like well this is totally wrong because these girls are being judged on looks but not only that on specific looks! Are they tall enough, thin enough, does their hair accentuate their facial features or is their walk that of a beauty queen. On the other hand I hear girls say that they do this to help other girls be confident in their own skin and just own it. But how true is that and where does it end in the beauty world???? Will beauty out of the social norm ever really be accepted. The fashion and beauty world have both recently expanded their brands to fit a more variety of peoples body shape, skin color, race, and gender. In the back of my mind i always think about if these brands do all of this to please society. Part of me thinks thats true because I’ve seen both clothes in the regular section and the plus size section and let me tell you most of the clothes in the plus size section were not cute! Why would brands do this! I feel like people who are already being outcassed to a whole other section of the store will only be made to feel worse when they see the clothing that the brand went out of their way to create for their body size. I don’t understand why clothing stores do this. When you walk  into stores like forever 21 you have sections that pertain to different styles. You have the edgy style section, work style, casual style and workout clothing section just to name few. Then with a BIG sign you see the plus size section! Why can’t the all the clothes sizes be together. I don’t get it! The beauty industry does this type of discrimination as well. Certain brands only carry a number of darker foundation colors or the colors they make for eyeliners and lipsticks are only made to accentuate people of a lighter skin tone. I was once in a make up store and heard an employee tell the darker skin tone girl that the brand of foundation make up she wanted did not have darker skintones. To me make up is art and that means every one should be able to enjoy it if they want to. 

Oct 152016
 

         This week every other article or news report in the media was about presidential nominee Donald Trump and his objectification of women. Hearing all of his misogynistic comments about young girls and women made me realize that he is an advocate for social beauty standards.Trump not only sexualizes women he also  judges and classifies women based on their physical appearance.

          Trump like many other people in society prefer to hire someone who is considered “attractive” rather then someone who has the qualifications for a specific job. In a 2007 appearance in San Fransisco Donal Trump said, ” She’s so beautiful. And my people came and she said, “Mr. Trump, she has no experience.” So I interviewed her anyway because she was so pretty. And I said, “Let me ask you, do you have any experience?” She goes, “No, sir.” I say, “When can you start?,” this in regards to a seventeen/eighteen year old woman. This is not the only time that Trump has used someones “level of attractiveness” to convey whether or not they are capable of working for him. According to an article on CNN Trump, wanted to fire female employees he thought of as unattractive and replace them with better-looking women at a golf resort he owned. It is reported that Trumps standard for beauty made management rotate scheduling so that the most “attractive” employees would work when Mr. Trump would come around. His value for beauty among female employees caused managers to value appearance over skill when making hiring and staffing decisions. 

          Until recently Donald Trump was the owner of the Miss Universe beauty pageant. In this beauty pageant women represent their home country and compete for the prestigious title of Miss Universe. In the year 1996 Alicia Machado, representative of Venezuela was crowned the most beautiful women in the world however her dream of being Miss Universe soon came to an assailing halt because of Donald Trump. Alicia states in an interview with CNN’s Anderson Cooper that Trump called her “Miss Piggy” and that he was very cruel and mean to her. Donal Trump defends himself by saying that “She was the winner and you know, she gained a massive amount of weight and it was a real problem. We had a real problem.” Alicia says that this caused her to have negative body issues and resulted in her developing serious eating disorders. 

         Donald Trump has a social platform that many people would kill for. However his views on beauty standards are only creating a larger barrier between realistic beauty standards and his cloud nine standards. What society (including Mr.Trump) doesn’t understand when it comes to beauty standards is that every person is built differently. Setting up beauty standards for society in which it conveys our capabilities upon anything is wrong. How do you tell a child that depending on their physical appearance they may or may not be able to be or do what they want. How do you tell someone that their voice will only matter if they are “pretty” enough. In a land where we are suppose to be free we are being enslaved to the conception of a standard  that is said to be  conceptualized in the eye of the beholder. If Mr. Trump becomes president to this already great nation we will no longer ask for resumes but for head shots. 

http://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2016/09/trump-youre-hired/502136/

http://www.cnn.com/2016/09/27/politics/alicia-machado-donald-trump-2016-election-anderson-cooper/index.html

 

http://www.cnn.com/2016/09/29/politics/donald-trump-golf-club-lawsuit-female-employees/